The KIT ─ Knowledge & Information Technology
Issue No. 73 - 1 June 2012
Was this forwarded to you?
In This Issue
The KIT Is Three Years Old
Cutter IT Journal Opportunities
IBM and Business Process Management
Seen Recently
CB photo
Consulting Services
  • IT Strategy
  • EA / SOA / BPM
  • IT Innovation Briefings
  • IT Due Diligence
  • Vendor Selection
  • Executive IT Seminars
  • Cloud Computing
  • Grid Computing
  • Security Maturity
  • Knowledge Strategy
  • Technical Communities
  • Knowledge Capture
  • Enterprise Social Networking
Contact Us:
c�b� IT and Knowledge Management
www.cebe-itkm.com
info@cebe-itkm.com

+1 281 460 3595
Twitter: @cbaudoin 
Forward this newsletter to colleagues and friends: use the "forward email" link below at left, rather than "Forward" in your email software, to preserve your privacy, give the recipient more options (their own unsubscribe link, etc.) and to give us better click-through data from ConstantContact.  Thanks!
Oh My, KIT, How You've Grown Up!
Issue No. 73 doesn't sound that impressive until you realize that it means the KIT is entering its fourth year. Thanks for reading, and remember that first, you can contribute by sending your findings to info@cebe-itkm.com, and second, you can forward this issue to others and encourage them to join too.
Writing Opportunities

The August issue of the Cutter IT Journal will be about standards for the cloud. Guest-edited by Mitchell Ummel, it will probably draw in part from the work of the Cloud Standards Customer Council (CSCC), although other perspectives are of course welcome. The deadline for abstracts is today, but if you have a strong urge to write something, please see the Call for Papers and submit an idea a.s.a.p., including over the week-end.

 

The September issue is not completely decided, but is expected to be about the role (and issues) of intellectual property in innovation and inter-enterprise collaboration. The guest editor will be Claude Baudoin and the CFP should be issued around June 20. Contact Claude if you have ideas about topics that the issue should address. 

IBM and Business Process Transformation

On May 23, IBM held a small seminar in Austin with the unwieldy title of "Business Process Innovation with BPM and Operational Decision Management." Almost as many words as there were attendees! Those who neglected this event missed an interesting (if IBM-centric) update on the BPM industry. This article is an excerpt of Claude Baudoin's notes.

 

IBM said that the days when 60% of BPM projects would fail are long gone. The field has matured much. Still, for someone who started doing process models in 1992 (using a Mac-based tool, with a notation that basically could do everything BPMN 1.0 did), it is surprising that few companies still undertake a systematic effort to model their processes, be it for analysis and improvement, in view of automating them, or simply for documentation and training.

 

IBM's presence is the result of the iLog and Lombardi acquisitions, and they claim 29% of the market. A large part of the Websphere portfolio is made of BPM solutions. It still seems that in spite of the rebranding, the tools are not yet fully integrated. Indeed, the speakers talked about the WebSphere process management tools and the iLog rules engine as if they came with "some assembly required." The argument that they are treated separately because some clients require one without the other sounded disingenuous. MarCom is way ahead of product engineering with slick marketing videos that are almost entirely content-free. However, some convincing information was shown about the newer tools' capabilities to analyze processes for performance issues.

 

The Websphere process modeling capability is now delivered in the cloud as BlueWorks Live, with an innovative real-time collaborative drawing capability, reminiscent of Google Wave or of SAP Gravity, seemingly well adapted to distributed process discovery sessions. 

 

The seminar was hosted by BP3, a BPM consultancy whose people presented five useful BPM anti-patterns, and otherwise talked about Agile at length without really saying how this related to BPM.  

Seen Recently...

"Architectural change is always pattern-based. Start with simple but relevant enterprise patterns, using simple (even simplistic) diagrams."

-- @cuttertweets, about one of Roger Evernden's points in his

Cutter Webinar and Executive Report on "Enterprise Patterns:

the Key to Effective EA Application to Transformation"