|
As those of you who attended our meeting last month know, the City is moving forward with a significantly reduced waterfront flood mitigation plan construction in light of the NPS determination that a pump station was an inappropriate use of open space and would not be permitted in Waterfront Park. While there are some indications that the City tried to persuade the US Department of Interior to reconsider that decision, but were unsuccessful.
So—bottom line as of today—the City will move forward with plans that of necessity are much more modest than those proposed in the past.
It is now expected that Council will hear from staff at its June 13 meeting, which at present will also be a public hearing on this issue. It is anticipated that Council will receive a cost and schedule update, validate the general project approach, consider approval of a draft contract for the builder, and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the subject agreement should the City elect to accept a negotiated Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) proposal. This may occur as early as June 13, at the regular Saturday City Council meeting.
Note: for those of you who wish to attend in person, you must now drive to the west end of the City to the Mark Center Drive government building. No more City Hall meetings looking at the Alexandria waterfront etching on the walls, the stately curtains, the fine woodwork. Or, you can stay home and sign up to speak remotely. That works sometimes, and not others, but not always
At this time it is contemplated that during the construction phase, both Point Lumley and Waterfront Park will be used as staging areas. Contractors are happy to get as much space as possible, regardless of the impact on nearby residents and businesses.
At a recent Waterfront Commission meeting, it became apparent that the issue of Pt. Lumley—more or less dormant during the pumpstation controversy—could become the next issue as there might be a difference of opinion regarding business necessity and a desire for open space. We will stay on top of this as it unfolds.
The Waterfront Commission has requested that the City explore in “its further reviews of the long-term status of the Strand St. Point Lumley parking lot”, and “whether these mitigation steps or other solutions would enable the permanent closure of the parking lot.”
And therein, of course, lies the rub.
Already squeezed between a variety of construction projects, and enduring one garage closing after another, the businesses in and around the Waterfront Park area are deeply, and understandably, worried. The City’s relentless quest to reduce parking in Old Town, whether permanent or temporary, has added to the crisis we now face. The closure of one critical parking area, the Solo garage, to put a few dollars into the City property tax revenue piggy bank, but that resulted in the removal of 72 public parking spaces in that space alone. Eliminating an additional 57 spaces on The Strand will only make matters worse.
What might be considered is impossible to predict. The businesses are working to see if there are viable ways to increase available parking. But, as we all know, there is no way to accomplish this that is easy.
|