In their January 19th meeting the Nevada Board of Agriculture heard input from participants who expressed opposition to the changes being sought by the Nevada Department of Agriculture to eliminate positions on the Board of Directors for representatives who are cattle producers and sheep producers as they spelled out in their pre-filed legislation, SB 54.
Nevada Farm Bureau stated, “We are opposed to the way in which this legislation was brought forward and we are opposed to the proposal to remove representatives of the cattle sector and the sheep industry, lumping the two remaining seats into the category of ‘livestock.’”
The question over the process, raised by Farm Bureau, ties back to the authority and responsibility of the Board of Agriculture. Without the Board having an opportunity to evaluate the legislation that the Department of Agriculture pre-filed, contrary to state law until after the legislation was already introduced.
“In our view,” Nevada Fam Bureau said, referring to the first three subsections of the state law (NRS 561.105), …“we maintain that no bills, introduced by the Department of Agriculture should have advanced into the legislative process without a full public vetting, by this Board, to determine what was intended and whether they were appropriate.”
After hearing from those who participated in the allotted public comment period, Board members each shared their views on the proposed actions in the Department’s remake of the membership criteria for the Board. A consensus view emerging from these discussions was that removing the cattle and sheep producers from the Board was not something that would have any support. Further, a number of members expressed their belief that their role should include review of regulations related to programs operating within the Department of Agriculture and other decisions that they have been excluded from over the past couple of years.
In the final outcome the Board approved a proposal for several amendments to come from the Board, keeping the current positions and adding two additional seats for the qualifications that the Department has proposed, clarifying some other language in the pre-filed bill for row crops and proposing to change the present limitation of two members coming from a single county to allow for three.