|
HRPP/IRB Newsletter
December 2024
| |
Rutgers University has earned full accreditation from the Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs (AAHRPP).
Learn more.]=
| |
|
Save the Date: 12/19/2024
Resources for Researchers Through the CTSA Trial Innovation Network
| |
|
The Rutgers Health Clinical Trials Office invites you to join them for the virtual NJ ACTS Special Lecture on Thursday, December 19th from Noon to 1:30 PM.
Their speakers are Dr. Daniel Ford from Johns Hopkins and Dixie Thompson from the University of Utah. Dr. Ford and Ms. Thompson will speak to our Rutgers Health community about the resources available to us through the CTSA Trial Innovation Network (TIN).
Part of the webinar will focus on resources available through the TIN when we (as Rutgers) serve as a coordinating site for multi-center clinical trials, and the other part will focus on additional resources and toolkits available to all study teams and investigators.
This will be an incredibly valuable session for our clinical research community! Please note that registration is required.
| |
|
Save the Date: 1/6/2025
Demystifying the IRB - Student Edition
| |
|
Join us on Monday, January 6th from Noon to 1:00 PM for a hands-on workshop designed to introduce first-time student researchers to the Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) and guide them through the Institutional Review Board (IRB) submission process.
This is a tremendous opportunity to familiarize yourself with IRB requirements and equip yourself with tools and knowledge for a successful IRB submission.
Please feel free to share this workshop with colleagues who may be interested!
If you have any questions, reach out to DRAFT Services at irbdraftservices@research.rutgers.edu.
| |
|
Unpacking the World Medical Association's
Updates to the Declaration of Helsinki
| |
|
Originally adopted in June 1964, the World Medical Association (WMA) recently released an update to the Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Participants.
This is the eighth revision and first update since 2013.
As described in the article Declaration of Helsinki revised to modernize research ethics standards, "Several key revisions augment respect for individuals participating in medical research as partners and co-creators in the advancement of science and knowledge."
These updates include:
- Replacing the term "subjects" with "participants" to emphasize a "meaningful engagement with potential and enrolled participants and their communities."
- New language that "calls on researchers to carefully consider how the benefits, risks and burdens of research are distributed."
- A paradigm shift in inclusion and exclusion criteria as it pertains to vulnerable populations. The WMA noted that "starting with a default of exclusion for all those in positions of vulnerability had resulted in enormous gaps in medical knowledge about certain populations." The changes in language related to vulnerable populations aims to address these disparities.
- Rewrites to the section on informed consent for biobanking. "Prior language failed to adequately address the growing risks and need for consent and privacy protections related to the increased use of stored personal data after trials... New language calls for free and informed consent for the collection, processing, storage and foreseeable secondary use of biological material and data and for ethics committee approval and monitoring of such databases and biobanks.”
| |
Updates to ClinicalTrials.gov | |
|
Modernization Progress Report Available
The 2023-2024 Modernization Effort, Summary of Progress report gives an update on the Modernized ClinicalTrials.gov and PRS websites, discusses progress on the modernization strategic goals, communication strategy, and plans for future modernization activities.
Modernized PRS Webinar Materials Available
During the October 8, 2024 webinar, ClinicalTrials.gov staff highlighted features of the Modernized PRS, discussed future plans, and answered questions during the webinar. Access the webinar recording and transcript.
PRS Updates Available
The latest release notes of the Modernized PRS includes several important fixes made in response to user feedback. PRS users are encouraged to continue to use the modernized website and provide user comments to the PRS Team.
Important Note: The Modernized PRS is still under development, so users may see differences in their study records between the classic and modernized websites. If you find discrepancies, use the classic PRS to review the record and resolve any validation errors or warnings. Users should be sure to save their changes before switching between the two sites.
For additional information about modernization-related events and resources, visit the ClinicalTrials.gov Modernization webpage. For assistance with any ClinicalTrials.gov questions, contact Rutgers ClinicalTrials.gov Support at rutgersctgsupport@research.rutgers.edu.
| |
|
The Rutgers IRB is dedicated to finding innovative ways to support our researchers. We have a whole suite of Interactive Tools at your disposal.
Check out all of our Interactive IRB Tools here.
Still getting acquainted with the eIRB+ platform? We have Quick Guide Resources available for all eIRB+ applications to provide you with an illustrative step-by-step walkthrough of the eIRB+ applications.
| |
Attending a virtual eIRB+ Workshop to learn more about the updates to our submission platform and business processes. The eIRB+ Workshop session offers a comprehensive walkthrough of updated features, step-by-step application tutorials, and provides an opportunity to address any questions you may have. | |
Consult with HRPP/IRB Subject Matter Experts | |
|
Virtual Institutional Review Board (IRB) Office Hours
DRAFT (Document Revision And Feedback Team) Services hosts IRB Office Hours weekly.
| |
|
When:
- Tuesdays, 1 – 1:30 pm
with IRB Reliance Team
* No office hours will be held on Tuesday, 12/31/2024
- Thursdays, 10 – 10:30 am
** No office hours will be held on Thursday, 12/26/2024
Where:
Office Hours Zoom Link
Passcode: 133269
More information on what to expect during Virtual IRB Office Hours.
| |
|
The mission of the Document Review and Feedback Team (DRAFT) is to improve IRB submission outcomes by recommending and educating study teams on HRPP/IRB considerations and best practices through pre-reviews and consultations.
Learn more about DRAFT.
| | |
|
The IRB Reliance Team provides subject matter expertise and consultations on the IRB requirements for collaborative research.
These subject matter experts are adept at assisting study teams with navigating IRB requirements for engaging in multi-institutional research.
Learn more about Reliance.
| |
Congratulations to IRB Co-Chair Dr. Richard Drachtman on the birth of his grandson. | | |
|
|
Malica T. Dock, Assistant Director of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) Reliance Team within the Rutgers Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) and Institutional Review Board (IRB) presented, “Are You Leaving Money on the Table? Ensuring IRB Fees are Accounted for in a Single IRB (sIRB) World” at the 2024 Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research (PRIM&R) Annual Conference in Seattle, WA.
Her session took a deeper dive into the life cycle of research and explored when IRB fees should and could be recouped when an IRB serves as a single IRB or when it cedes review.
| |
|
Andrea Dragan, MPH, CIP, Director of Quality Assurance and Evaluation within the Rutgers Human Research Protection Program (HRPP), contributed an article to the October/November 2024 Issue of the National Council of University Research Administrators (NCURA) online magazine.
Her article "The Alchemy of Auditing" outlines four steps a quality assurance and evaluation team can take to transform their compliance program and foster a partnership of compliance with its researchers.
Full article here (subscription to NCURA required).
Andrea also moderated Dr. Benjamin S. Wilfond’s poster abstract presentation, “The ENVISION study: Creating a values-oriented platform for informed consent” at the 2024 Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research (PRIM&R) Annual Conference in Seattle, WA.
| |
| |
|
|
Kristen D. Krause, PhD, MPH, Institutional Review Board (IRB) Committee Member, Rutgers School of Public Health faculty and Deputy Director of the Center for Health, Identity, Behavior and Prevention Studies (CHIBPS) presented, “Robots in Disguise: When Your Participants are More Than Meets the Eye” at the 2024 Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research (PRIM&R) Annual Conference in Seattle, WA.
Drawing on lessons learned from case studies, her session offered strategies and resources for anticipating and responding to bots by identifying IRB and research (mis)steps, strategic and thoughtful safeguard moves, and interdepartmental routines for research compliance and bot prevention.
| |
|
Doretha Walker, PhD, MPA, Community Institutional Review Board (IRB) Committee Member, presented, “Nurturing True Inclusion: Moving Beyond Tokenism to Actual Inclusion” at the 2024 Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research (PRIM&R) Annual Conference in Seattle, WA.
Her session was geared towards human and animal research programs. It explored tokenism and lead a discussion into how venturing beyond the bounds of tokenism can lead to a broader range of thoughts, ideas, and opinions that can lead to sustainable and better solutions, as well as greater access to research communities and resources with and between organizations.
| |
| |
|
|
Michelle Watkinson, CIP, Training & Communications Manager within the Rutgers Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) and Institutional Review Board (IRB) presented, “Help! I Don’t Understand: Making the Consent Process and Form Meaningful Through Health Literacy and Adult Learning Theory” at the 2024 Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research (PRIM&R) Annual Conference in Seattle, WA.
Her session proposed an alternate method to addressing the Belmont Report’s ethical principles of “respect for persons” and “justice” by addressing the barriers that exist for many people and communities which prevent them from participating in research. Through the integration of adult learning theory principles into informed consent procedures, this session offered insights into how to close health inequality gaps.
| | | | |