This Week in Teaneck -

Focus Council Meeting



PUBLISHED BY TEANECK VOICES

6/26/2023

Contents:


This Week in Teaneck - Focus Council Meeting

Developing on Development

Teaneck Creek Conservancy - A Different Kind of Redevelopment

The OPRA Saga Continues

Revaluation Inspections are Underway

Still Waiting For.....

  • A Township Website Re-design?
  • User Friendly 2023 Municipal Budget?


Announcements:


PRIDE Film Festival - 6/23 & 6/30


Contacting Teaneck Voices

This Week in Teaneck-

Focus on Council Meeting

Hackensack River Greenway Advisory Board – Monday June 26, 2023 at 8:00 pm by Zoom Click Here and add passcode 422510. Click Here for Agenda


Teaneck Council – Regular Meeting – Tuesday, June 27 at 8:00 pm – hybrid both in-person in Council Chambers and by Zoom (Click Here with passcode 703943). For Agenda packet Click Here


·       Council will vote:

o  1) on a resolution (Res 205-2023) to approve previously nominated new appointments to Teaneck’s two land use boards;


These nominations were, as usual, approved at the prior (6/13) Council meeting and if approved by majority vote on 6/27 would seat 3 first-time resident appointments to the Planning Board and 3-first time residents to the Board of Adjustment. Voices supports all of these appointments in part because 5 of these residents will bring training and competencies to the boards that those boards have long been missing. Two of the residents are certified municipal planners, two are attorneys and one is an engineer. Both boards have for several years been deeply (and expensively) mired in litigation cases that presumably these higher-skilled new members can help the boards avoid. Another benefit of the new appointees is that they increase the representation of several Town demographics that have recently been under-represented on these boards.


Voices urges its readers to attend or participate by zoom if you want Council to know your views.


o  2) to appoint Scott Pleasant as the Town’s First Poet Laureate (Res. 206-2023) and


o  3) to try again – apparently newly-supported by a former Council opponent - to introduce approval of a bond ordinance that would enable the Town to purchase a new ladder truck (29-2023) since the prior ordinance had previously failed to secure the 5 votes needed for bond ordinances.


·       Also expect several new develop-related agenda items to be added to or explained during the Council meeting. See the Voices article Developing on Development in this edition.


Youth Advisory Board (YAB) – Wednesday June 28, 2023 at 7:00 pm – Rm 4 in the Rodda Center


Teaneck Board of Education – Special Meeting) – Wednesday June 28, 2023 at 7:30 pm – In-person only at the Administrative offices at 651 Teaneck Road


·        Purposes of the Special Meeting: 1. Review Superintendent’s Evaluation, 2. Approve Settlement Agreements, 3. Approve Anticipated Facility Usage Request forms for 2023-2024, 4. Approve One Year Renewal of the Christ Episcopal Church Lease Space Agreement,5. Approve Job Descriptions, 6. Approve Employment Contract Renewals for 2023-2024 for Non-Bargained Staff, 7. Approve New Hires for the 2023-2024, 8. Approve Extended School Year Staff for 2023-2024, 9. Approve Resignations.


The Community Meeting on the American Legion Drive AINR originally scheduled for Thursday June 28, 2023 has been cancelled and/or postponed (depending on which website notice you read). Watch this space for an update. 

Developing on Development

Included in the updated agenda for Tuesday’s (6-27) Council meeting are two agenda items that represent what we hope is a new trend in the way that the new Council (and its land use boards) will inform the public about development concepts and approaches before they are placed as a resolution or an ordinance on an agenda to be voted and approved.


1)   Included as an Information Item only for Tuesday is a presentation described as 189 the Plaza Proposed Pilot; NW Financial (Click Here, p. 12). When the prior Council and Planning Board were approving a development plan for this long-delayed 189 The Plaza project, the concept of giving the owner/developer a Payment In Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) deal was discussed at length, made possible because this property is a lot identified in the State Street AINR.

 

The two previous PILOTs given to AINR developers by the Township have been described by Voices as unacceptable giveaways to developers. But the economic terms of those pilots were never publicly described before they were approved. (For example, Click Here for a video of the prior Council’s discussion of PILOTS in September 2022).


This time Council apparently is allowing us to review the economics of a proposed PILOT before it becomes like the vague language in previous PILOT ordinances Council is asked o approve..


Residents will want to watch/listen very carefully to this PILOT presentation by what we are told is an independent Consultant skilled in PILOT analysis. AINR’s of which every PILOT is necessarily a part are currently NOT receiving broad support from Teaneck residents.) The public should soon be receiving a copy of this new PILOT analysis presentation before it is folded into a PILOT ordinance.

 

2)   The other development concept being explored by Council on Tuesday night (6/27) , apparently led by Mayor Pagan and Council member Belcher, is Accessory Dwelling Units (ACU's). (Click Here, p. 13)  The concept is currently being explored by the State Legislature and has recently been adopted in both Montclair and Maywood. The concept would expand allowable housing configurations on single-family residential properties to accommodate multi-generational family arrangements. Our readers may well want to read up on this concept before the Council meeting and might best do so by Clicking Here or to see what the NJ legislature is thinking Click Here.

3)   Another development issue may by Tuesday’s meeting be added to the Council agenda. The long-long-long-delayed settlement of the litigation concerning the Township’s hospital zone expansion ordinance brought by the HNMC’s neighbors is, once again, rumored to be imminent. Voices is hoping that if that issue is finally being resolved, the public will receive adequate notice about it before Council is asked to approve the settlement.

Teaneck Creek Conservancy -

A Different Kind of Redevelopment

Remember going to the Nature Hut at summer camp? It was the gathering place to explore all that was around us. There were towering trees, bramble bushes, dirt paths with tree roots jutting out waiting to trip us, beautiful green moss, salamanders (we tried to catch them, though we didn’t know why), streams and creeks with frogs and toads and turtles (we tried to scoop up tadpoles in old mayonnaise jars), and leeches – and maybe some birds and other wild life.


Have you been back since those long ago days? If you have, you may have had difficulty even finding the Nature Hut. If you did, it was probably covered in wild invasive species and draped with vines. The well-worn dirt paths have disappeared, and you ripped the skin on your arms trying to make your way through the no-longer-familiar territory. Nothing was the same. That land of your childhood was gone.


Nature – natural environments – are not like the old neighborhood of homes and stores and sidewalks. Those old neighborhoods may be the worse for wear and tear over time, but they stay the same until someone actively intervenes. Not so nature. Trees and plants grow, creeks and streams flow where they will, natural foods for some wildlife disappears and so do those who fed there. Food for other species emerges from the earth, and those new species arrive to dine. The natural environment is never static; it is always changing, often losing it’s original beauty and choking what is trying to emerge.


Welcome to the Teaneck Creek Conservancy (TCC)! What we just described is what new Executive Director of the TCC, Kathleen Farley, found when she arrived to take on the huge challenge of “restoring” the beloved TCC. But the challenge she found was even larger than anyone anticipated.  She faced two big tasks: 1) Not restoring TCC, but redeveloping it, and 2) Guiding the community who grew up with the old Teaneck Creek and surroundings to accept change.


When Kathleen arrived, TCC was wild and overgrown. Beautiful old trees were dying from within, standing very much on their last legs, wild invasive species encroached on plants and other growth that once fed birds and insects, most of which had disappeared from the local environment. What was once beautiful, had lost its splendor – and most of all, it was not healthy for the environment and the creatures that lived there.


However, when Kathleen arrived, she met with long-time lovers of TCC who pointed out to her, “This is our park; this is where we rode our bikes, this is where we walked our dogs; we don’t want change.”


Kathleen and her team accepted the challenge of re-imagining the park and helping the community accept the changes over time. She emphasizes that the park is to be both beautiful and healthy, both a garden and a special place of conservation. She and others, especially long-time steward George Reskakis, and partners like the Hackensack Riverkeeper, the Audubon Society and the pride of TCC the Puffin Foundation have conducted walks and talks to introduce the new park to the community.


With the grand opening held throughout May 2023 when the new greenery and buds were showing off the park at its best, visitors were introduced to the beautiful new growth and introduced to various conservation measures like rain barrels. TCC is setting up rain barrels to water the gardens including a garden with native plants. There have been talks about the migratory patterns of birds, and the health and biodiversity of new plantings.


As well, joining with their partner the Puffin Foundation, TCC is bringing music and art to the outdoors with jazz concerts and artists invited to paint outdoors.


Now that TCC is on its way, Kathleen and her team want to hear from members of the community: What are people looking for? What do they want? What can TCC bring to them?


One long-time member who loves the park runs a program once a month teaching participants how to document the flora growing in the redeveloped park. She instructs them in the use iNaturalist an App that links photos anyone can post with a large database and a wide membership to identify TCC’s flora and participate in building an extensive data base.


Kathleen tells about one long-time park visitor who expressed her unhappiness that changes were going to be made to the park. Though she agreed it had become unsightly, she initially resisted change. But she recognized – as Kathleen teaches – that the land is always changing and true stewardship requires redevelopment to respond to the natural changes.


This member is now a strong advocate of the new TCC and has documented her thoughts in a flyer available as you enter the Teaneck Creek Conservancy Park. It is called “Park Perspectives: What Happened at Teaneck Creek? Thoughts from a restoration skeptic.”


Teaneck Voices suggests you visit and see what YOU think!

The OPRA Saga Continues


The ongoing effort to provide public access to public records in a transparent democracy has a long and tortured history. The NJ Open Public Records Act (OPRA) is the state statute at the center of this struggle in New Jersey.  But nowhere has that struggle long been more center stage than in the larger municipal communities in New Jersey’s District 37


The late Byron Baer who served for 28 years in the state legislature had originally entered politics as a Council member from Englewood, NJ. But, according to his spouse, Baer was quickly frustrated – even though now a town elected official - with not being able to secure governmental information about his own town. He was, in fact, so frustrated that he went to Trenton as a state legislator principally to secure passage of the public records release legislation which today bears his name, the Senator Byron M. Baer Open Public Records Act (OPRA) and Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA)! The legislator who succeeded Baer in this effort, recently retired State Senator Loretta Weinberg, spent much of her time in 17 years in the State Senate trying to protect and update OPRA.


While Weinberg worked OPRA in Trenton, the actual administration of OPRA in her hometown, Teaneck, was not going well – was regularly criticized – and litigated. Citizen complaints about denials of OPRA requests and many-months long delays in answering and/or fulfilling OPRA requests are a consistent issue in public input portions of Teaneck Council meetings. Sometimes those complaints have been taken to state superior court and important precedents protecting OPRA requestors have been won there by not only local OPRA expert attorney C.J. Griffin but also by other OPRA attorney advocates.


Paradoxically, for Teaneck’s own Township Attorneys, OPRA business had become big business – amounting to some $200K in hourly fees in 2022. Those Township Attorney contracts had in the prior few years gradually been rewritten (by the Attorney, himself) so that compensation for the Town’s OPRA review work was no longer part of the attorney retainer but was separately billed at an hourly rate. The more the public sought public information they were entitled to, the more money our township attorney made as requestors chafed! And though the public official responsible for governmental records remained the Teaneck Township Clerk, most of the time and effort on OPRA got transferred to the Township Attorney’s firm.


OPRA requests then developed 3 typical responses: 1) they got denied; 2) they were given incredibly long (multi-month) extensions and 3) even when requests were fulfilled, the records were often largely redacted with black magic markers blotting out much of the key information and often without required justifications. And under Teaneck’s prior Council there were repeated efforts to get official Council support for legislative initiatives by state associations targeting OPRA execution.


Meanwhile, once Senator Weinberg was no longer fighting for OPRA preservation, state legislators began putting together OPRA legislative amendments which – though claiming to be pro transparency -- were actually trying to knock out the provisions that had made NJ public records actually (not just theoretically) available. 


Ideas popped into proposed OPRA state statutory amendments like 1) shutting denied requestors out of the courts and into the long-lumbering administrative mechanism, the Government Records Council (GRC); 2) excluding requests for some government contract records; and 3) taking away the requirement that when attorneys successfully win OPRA cases for requestors they get their attorneys’ fees paid for by the government unit that had improperly denied their OPRA requests.


Let’s come to the present situation. Is there any reason to be concerned that despite the state’s persistent political rhetoric favoring “more government transparency,” that harm to OPRA might now actually happen in Trenton?


Well, take a look at the bill (A5614) that Assemblyman Joe Danielson submitted to the Assembly just one week ago (June 15) and which quickly got sent to committee. (Click Here to see the recent NJ Monitor story on this initiative) Those who know Trenton well fully expect that there soon will be a similar initiative to be launched by the traditional OPRA-critic members of the other legislative body, the Weinberg-less state senate.


So, is there any good news on these matters?  Happily, Voices can report, Teaneck appears to have turned the corner on at least one transparency issue. Council appears to have understood this issue when it decided NOT to appoint a new OPRA attorney – but instead refocus OPRA responses as the responsibility of the Clerk’s Office – and lodging OPRA decisions that require real legal adjudication to once again be compensated by the new Township Attorney’s  retainer not attorney's working out their OPRA denials on hourly billing schemes !


We will have to watch and see – but it looks like the business of fielding and responding to most of Teaneck’s OPRA requests is being returned to the Clerk’s Office where it clearly belongs under state law.  Teaneck Voices will continue to be vigilant! 


Revaluation Inspections Are Underway

The Township made this announcement on Monday June 26, 2023:


Starting today, inspectors from Appraisal Systems, Inc. will begin to visit all properties, measuring and photographing the exteriors of all buildings and inspecting the interiors.

In order to properly assess your property, it will be necessary for a representative of Appraisal Systems, Inc. to examine the interior of your property. The first visit from an inspector will be unannounced between the hours of 9:00am and 5:00pm. If the homeowner is not present at the first visit, the inspector will leave a card specifying a return date to do the interior inspection. The notice will also have a telephone number to call to reschedule this appointment if the time or date is not convenient.

Appraisal Systems, Inc. representatives will carry photo identification and their names will be registered with the Police Department and the Township Clerk’s office. Please do not allow anyone to enter your home without proper identification. You will be requested to sign the field form used by the representative to acknowledge that an interior inspection was made. Please advise the occupants of any rental units you may own so they are prepared for the inspection.

Still Waiting For ..


Still Waiting for...

A Township Website Redesign – It has now been months since Voices pointed out that not only did the Town not get a new website design by the promised “end of 2022”, but it has now been months since the Town got 5 seemingly strong website designer bids for the Town website redesign. For inexplicable reasons, no one has said an official word about the issue since their bids were open. What about at least a “status” report at the June 27 Council?


Still Waiting for...

A User-Friendly 2023 Budget – The state unambiguously requires that municipalities publish a User-Friendly budget once its annual budget has been approved. Many towns new require their CFO’s to produce much earlier versions - while their budgets are still in negotiation. Not Teaneck!

In fact, where is Teaneck's required adopted budget User-Friendly budget?



ANNOUNCEMENTS

Contacting Teaneck Voices


By Email: [email protected]

By Phone: 201-214-4937

By USPS Mail: Teaneck Voices, PO Box 873. at 1673 Palisade Ave. 07666

Teaneck Voices' Website is www.teaneckvoices.com


Sign Up Now
Send a Comment
Submit an Article
Editorial Policies
LinkedIn Share This Email