Approved For 6 CEU Credits
|
|
|
|
Nationally Recognized Social Media Attorney
|
|
A New Specialized Online Course That Gives Investigators Expert Strategies To Avoid Risk
Exposure When Sharing SOCMINT And OSINT
Evidence With Third Parties.
|
|
Social Media Investigations
|
|
Why This Course Is So Different...
|
|
What makes this course so different, is that instead of focusing on mining social media and open source data, I focus on employing expert strategies to share that data in your SMI reports and to third parties without liability.
|
|
|
The U.S. Supreme Court classifies social media evidence as "high liability" evidence that must be collected and shared with great care.
|
|
*See legal authority on the bottom of this flyer.
|
|
In My Online Course, You Learn An Easy To Apply
Proprietary
"Red Flag Warning System"
That Identifies
And Eliminates Or Disclaims
High Liability Speech
On Social Media Before You Share The Information With Third Parties.
|
|
- Libelous words, pictures, video, and live streaming
- Libel by implication memes, hashtags, and emoticons
- Defamatory reposts and retweets
- Libelous text messages, emails, podcasts, webinars
- Libelous speech and personal information from websites
- Speech not protected by the First Amendment
- Opinions that are actually facts, not pure protected opinions
- Medical information, especially mental health posts or tweets
- Posts or tweets that constitute cyberbulllying or harassment
- Posts or tweets that constitute discriminatory behavior
- Identifying evidence that is considered privileged communications
- Cloud storage data that triggers authenticity and privacy issues
- Content on apps that could trigger privacy issues
- Smart House and surveillance recordings
- Drone pictures and videos that trigger privacy claims
- Internet of Things recordings that trigger privacy claims
- Wearable technology recordings that trigger privacy claims
- Social Media posts or tweets involving mental health
- Social Media posts or tweets involving disabilities
- Social Media posts or tweets involving financial data
- Social Media posts or tweets involving driving information
- Speech that could trigger emotional distress claims
- Screencasted data absent the metadata.
|
|
Use My Online Course To Build Trust With Clients, Legal Professionals And Others That You Received Expert Training On Social Media Liability Issues...
|
|
My Online Course Takes The Guess Work Out
Of Eliminating Or Disclaiming "High Risk"
SOCMINT And OSINT Evidence...
|
|
No Stress: Learn At Your Own Pace
And On Your Own Schedule 24/7
|
|
 |
6 ONE HOUR MODULES
- One year to finish the course
- Modules are easy to follow
- Course is for non-lawyers
- Take quizzes again and again
- Legal updates all year
|
|
|
|
ANYTIME, ANYWHERE
- No travel, no overtime
- Learn at your own pace
- 24/7 access to any device
- Email me questions on content
- Great technical support
|
|
|
|
This Is A Smart $79 Investment In Protecting Your Career
|
Questions? Call 954-748-7698
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your Instructor Isn't Just An Attorney. He Is A 30 Year Nationally Recognized Digital Media Law Specialist That Uncovers The Hidden Liabilities Non-Experts Overlook.
|
|
As A Former Network Television Anchor, I Know How To Connect And Communicate Information In An Understandable Manner...
|
|
National Media Appearances
|
|
Attendees Constantly Say, "What Really Separates This Online Course From Others, Isn't Just The Depth Of Social Media Law Knowledge They Received,
It's My Passion And Teaching Ability"...
|
|
|
|
"Great program. Being aware of the hidden liabilities not discussed in other courses saves your public image, and big legal fees."
- Cindy Reid, Attorney, Davidson, NC
|
|
|
|
"I recently completed the online course from Social Media Attorney Mark Fiedelholtz and felt that it was a great value for the price. The course was relevant to what I do on a daily basis. The new knowledge will help me become a better investigator. I would highly recommend this course to all investigators involved in social media investigations."
Jeremiah Jones, CEO, Bosco, Legal Services Inc. Licensed Investigator
|
|
|
|
|
"What an eye-opening course. Mark's new strategies save your job and keep you from being sued. All law enforcement need this type of expert social media law training."
Shaun D. Jones
Spotsylvania Sheriff's Office, VA
|
|
|
|
"Mark, I was captivated by the wealth of new information in your online course. I highly recommend this course to all private and public sector investigators. Thank you for making
me legally smart."
Paul Godsentidemudia,
Private Investigator, Chicago, IL
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I have heard positive comments from the attendees. Many students in your class shook my hand and thanked me for bringing such a high quality course that pleased everyone."
Sgt. Farzad Shaif
Training Supervisor,
Pennsylvania State Police, Hershey, PA
Statewide Investigator Seminar
|
|
|
|
"Attorney Fiedelholtz is not only energetic and compassionate, but full of knowledge to protect the public service/safety sector from embarrassing claims and lawsuits."
- Ashley Aleshire
Prince George County Fire and EMS, VA
|
|
|
|
LEGAL AUTHORITY THAT SUPPORTS THE NEED FOR MY
EXPERT ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA LIABILITY ONLINE TRAINING
Social Media and Smartphones Are High Risk Platform
(Cases also impact private sector):
: Packingham v. North Carolina 137 S. Ct. 1730 (2017), Riley v. California 134 S. Ct. 2473 (2014), Elonis v. U.S. 135 S. Ct. 2001 (2015),
Privacy Issues:
Check your state's statute on password privacy, First and Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,
Applicable Federal Privacy And Speech Statutes:
Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act) (15 USC §45
),
American Disability Act 1990 Applied To Social Media,
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Right to Financial Privacy Act (1978), Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (1999), Video Privacy Protection Act
of 1988 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 2710 (2002))
Computer Fraud And Abuse Act Of 1986, Children's Online Privacy Protection Act Of 1998,
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act
(1986), Fair Credit Reporting Act (1970),
The Privacy Act of 1974, Public Law 93-5
U.S. Privacy Act Of 1974,
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998, 15 U.S.C. 6501–6505
,
Driver Privacy Protection Act, 18 United States Code, Section 2721
,
Writing A Social Media Policy
: Costco Wholesale Corporation and United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 371 [Case 34–CA–012421] Text Messages: City of Ontario, California v. Quon 130 S. Ct. 2619 (2010),
EEOC Social Media Policy Standards
: National Labor Relations Act,
Unprotected Opinions
: Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Company, 497 U.S. 1 (1990),
Training Standards For Public Sectorthat Are Instructive For Private Sector:
, City of Canton, Ohio v. Harris 489 U.S. 378 (1989), Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978),
Cases Highlighting The Importance Of Specialized Training To Capture An Affirmative Defense That Can Be Applied In A Social Media Context:
Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998), Burlington Industries Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742(1998). State of Mind For Punitive Damages Kolstad v. American Dental Ass'n,119 S.Ct. 218 (1999).,
|
|
|
|
|
|
www.legallysafesocialmedia.com
954-748-7698
mark@newsocialmedialaw.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
