TORAH PORTION: EMOR
Parashat Emor
May 13, 2022 | 12 Iyyar 5782
Torah: Leviticus 21:1-24:23 | Triennial: 23:23-24:24
Haftarah: Ezekiel 44:15-31
In this week's Torah Sparks, you'll find a D'var Torah on the Parashah by Ilana Kurshan called "Among the Bearded Barley", Vered Hollander-Goldfarb poses questions titled "Words: Worse Than Sticks and Stones?" and Bex Stern Rosenblatt writes a dvar haftara called "Working Behind the Scenes".
D'VAR TORAH
Among the Bearded Barley
Ilana Kurshan
 
Parshat Emor describes the Omer offering that must be brought to the Temple on the “day after the Sabbath” (Leviticus 23:16), interpreted by the rabbis as the sixteenth of Nisan, which is the second day of the Passover holiday. The Omer, which represents the first sheaf of barley from the harvest, is given to the priest, who waves it before God. The Torah teaches that until the day when the Omer offering is brought—a day referred to by the rabbis as Yom HaNef, the day of waving—it was forbidden to eat any of the new grain from that year. The Talmudic rabbis, in discussing the significance of the Omer offering following the Temple’s destruction, offer us insight into how we strike the appropriate balance between accepting the losses of the past and retaining hope in a restored future.
The Mishnah (Menahot 10:3) offers a vivid, elaborate description of how the Omer sacrifice was prepared. Messengers of the court would come on the day before Passover to fashion the stalks of barley into sheaves while the stalks were still attached to the ground, so as to make it easier to reap them. Once darkness had descended on the eve of the sixteenth of Nisan and the first day of Passover had concluded, people would come from near and far to watch the reaping. As soon as it grew fully dark, an emissary of the court would ask all those assembled, “Did the sun set?” They would respond yes. The emissary would then repeat the question, and again the people would respond in the affirmative. The dialogue would continue:
-“Should I reap the sheaves with this sickle?”
-“Yes.”
-“With this sickle?”
-“Yes.”
-“Shall I place the sheaves in this basket?”
-“Yes.”
-“In this basket?”
-“Yes.”
-“Shall I cut the sheaves?”
-“Cut them.”
-“Shall I cut the sheaves?”
-“Cut them.”

The Mishnah explains that all of this repetition was necessary on account of a heretical sect which had a different opinion as to when the Omer should be cut; the court emissaries wanted to make sure there were no heretics in their midst.
Once it was clear that there was full consensus among all those present as to when and how the Omer should be cut, the reapers would harvest the barley, an image immortalized by Alfred Tennyson in “The Lady of Shallot,” where “only reapers, reaping early / in among the bearded barley” at the riverside could hear the eponymous fairy lady singing. The reapers would then place the barley in baskets and bring it to the Temple courtyard, where the kernels were singed in fire. The kernels were then set down in the Temple courtyard, so that the wind might cool and dry them. Next they were placed in a mill for grinding, and a tenth of an ephah of the ground flour was sifted through thirteen sifters. After daybreak on the sixteenth of Nisan, the priest sacrificing the Omer would take the sifted measure of flour, add oil and frankincense, wave the offering, and bring it to the altar. At that moment, it became permitted to eat the new grain from that year’s harvest, and immediately—so the Mishnah declares with a flourish— the people would emerge and find the marketplace of Jerusalem full of flour.
All of this detail may seem surprising given that the Mishnah is ordinarily quite terse, not to mention the fact that it was compiled several generations after the Temple’s destruction. It is notable that on those rare occasions when the Mishnah delves into such extended narrative detail, the subject is almost always an aspect of Temple ritual: The bringing of the first fruits (M. Bikurim chapter 3), the offering of the daily sacrifice (M. Yoma chapter 2), the rite of the high priest on Yom Kippur (M. Yoma chapters 3-7), the Sotah procedure (M. Sotah chapters 1-3). It is as if the rabbis were giving voice to their longing for the Temple by staging and recreating its rituals in vivid and evocative narrative detail.
The extent of the sages’ longing for the Temple is evident in a decree about the Omer sacrifice issued by Rabban Yohanan ben Zakkai immediately following the Temple’s destruction. The Mishnah relates that Rabban Yohanan ben Zakkai—that same rabbi who was famously smuggled alive out of Jerusalem in a coffin during the Roman siege—decreed that in a world devoid of the Temple, it was forbidden to eat the new grain during the entire day of the sixteenth of Nisan (M. Menahot 10:5). At first this does not make sense; after all, the Torah specifies that the new grain could be eaten as soon as the Omer sacrifice was offered in the morning. Without a Temple, there could be no sacrifice. If Rabban Yohanan ben Zakkai were simply trying to commemorate the Temple, why then not just wait until the middle of the day, at which point the Omer would already have been offered had the Temple still been standing?
The Talmud states that the reason for Rabbi Yohanan’s decree is “speedily may the Temple be rebuilt” (Menahot 68b). That is, if the eating of the new grain were not prohibited throughout the entire day of the sixteenth of Nisan, then the people might forget the original rule and fail to observe it when, someday, the Temple was rebuilt. After all, the Temple could be rebuilt at any point, especially if one holds, like Rashi and Tosafot, that the third Temple would not be rebuilt by human hands, but would descend intact from heaven (see Rosh Hashanah 30a). What if the Temple happened to be rebuilt on the evening of the sixteenth of Nisan, and the Omer were offered later the next day? The Talmud explains that the eating of the new grain is prohibited all day because of the possibility—albeit a highly unlikely possibility—that perhaps that might be the very day that the Temple would be rebuilt.
Rabban Yohanan ben Zakkai’s decree concerning the eating of the new grain ensures not just that the memory of the Temple endures, but also that the people never let go of the hope for redemption that the rebuilding of the Temple represents. We are to live with the consciousness that at any moment, redemption might come. As such, this decree is a reminder that we should never become too comfortable in our imperfect world. If there are ideals that we hold dear—such as a world free of intolerance, or a world with true gender equity, or a world with clean air and pure water—then we must never grow too comfortable in a world where those ideals have yet to be realized.
The period of the Omer refers to the seven weeks between the sixteenth of Nisan when the Omer sacrifice was offered, and the festival of Shavuot. It is a time of anticipation, in which the Exodus from Egypt has already happened but the Ten Commandments have not yet been given on Sinai. With Rabban Yohanan ben Zakkai’s decree in mind, we dedicate ourselves during the Omer period to working toward a world that embodies our ideals
QUESTIONS TO PONDER
Words: Worse Than Sticks and Stones?
Vered Hollander-Goldfarb

Text: Vayikra 24:10-23

10And the son of an Israelite woman, whose father was an Egyptian, went out among the children of Israel; and they fought in the camp, this Israelite woman’s son and a man of Israel. 11And the Israelite woman’s son blasphemed The Name [of the Lord] and cursed; and so they brought him to Moshe. And his mother’s name was Shelomith the daughter of Dibri, of the tribe of Dan. 12Then they put him under guard, to parse to them according to the mouth of the LORD.
13And the Lord spoke to Moshe, saying, 14“Take outside the camp him who has cursed; then let all who heard him lay their hands on his head, and let all the congregation stone him. 15“Then you shall speak to the children of Israel, saying: ‘Whoever curses his God shall bear his sin. 16And whoever blasphemes the name of the Lord shall surely be put to death. All the congregation shall certainly stone him… 17‘Whoever kills any man shall surely be put to death. 18Whoever kills an animal shall make it good, animal for animal.  19‘If a man causes disfigurement of his neighbor, as he has done, so shall it be done to him— 20fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth; as he has caused disfigurement of a man, so shall it be done to him. 22You shall have the same law for the stranger and for one from your own country; for I am the Lord your God.’” 23Then Moshe spoke to the children of Israel; and they Israel did as the Lord commanded Moshe.

This text includes both narrative and legal material; consider the relationship between the two. Why does the penal law for violence appear in this narrative?
There is great emphasis on the affiliations of the two people involved in the fight. What is the significance of their backgrounds?  
The Torah does not tell us what the fight was about. How does that affect the understanding of the story? Can you think of another biblical story in which the details of the fight are obscured? Is there any connection between the stories?
The fight seems to lead to blaspheming and cursing. What is the power of a curse (or a blessing) in Tanakh? (Bereshit 27, Bamidbar 22:2-6.) Even today we might be upset by a curse. Why?
Pay attention to the involvement of the community. Why is it the community, not the individual with whom the “curser” was fighting, that needs to mete out punishment? In what situations today does the “community” rather than an individual press for justice?

For those interested in further study:
In the penal code: Shemot 21:15-25
In practice: I Kings 21.
HAFTARAH
Working Behind the Scenes
Bex Stern Rosenblat

Our haftarah expands on this week’s parasha, limiting the priestly work in the mikdash to a very specific subset of the priests, namely, the descendants of Zadok. We read about Zadok as a contemporary of King David, who was ever loyal to King David. When King David chose to flee Jerusalem in order to escape his rebelling son, Absalom, Zadok turns to flee with him, taking the ark of the covenant with him to accompany David. David will not let Zadok or the ark come, but Zadok’s heart is clearly in the right place. Later, as David’s days as ruler draw to a close and his sons once again vie for power, Zadok chooses the winning side again. He supports Solomon against Adonijah. When Solomon becomes king, Zadok is given the position of high priest.
Yet after this point, we do not hear about Zadok himself again. Zadok is conspicuously absent in the building and dedication of the First Temple. Solomon, the King whom Zadok anointed, is the one who builds and dedicates the Temple. And yet Zadok does not seem to be there at all. We read in 1 Kings 8 about the pains taken to move the ark of the covenant safely into its new home in the Temple. We cannot read it without recalling Zadok’s handling of it under King David. Yet here, King Solomon assembles the elders, the heads of the tribes for the honor of carrying the ark. The priests then take up their role in putting the ark into the newly constructed Temple. But once again, there is no mention made of Zadok, no mention made of the high priest. Zadok, who had already proved his mettle as someone who could carry the powerful and dangerous ark, is not tapped for the task this time. He may not even be present. In the very moment that seems like it should be the climax of his career as high priest, following in the footsteps of Aaron in the dedication of the mishkan, Zadok is absent. We hear, instead, Solomon’s voice raised up in praise to God.
Why did Zadok disappear at what should have been his finest hour and why do his descendants reappear hundreds of years later in our haftarah, after the destruction of the First Temple, as Ezekiel looks forward to the construction of the next? Why does our haftarah narrow the focus from all priests to all descendants of Zadok? Perhaps, Zadok and his descendants did play a specialized role. Perhaps, these sons of righteousness were the interim heads of school, the specialists who appear to get the job done in the moments of transition. Infinitely reliable, they pick up the slack when no one else can even hold the rope. But when the time for thank you speeches and assigning credit arrives, they bow out. In this way, they mirror both Moses of our parasha and Ezekiel of our haftarah. They get the job done and then they pass on the reins, never seeking the limelight.
Support Torah Sparks
 
Do you love Torah Sparks? It's brought to you by The Fuchsberg Jerusalem Center and we rely on your contributions to keep the learning going. Support Torah Sparks by making a donation to FJC or by selecting a subscription below:
For more information about the Fuchsberg Jerusalem Center, please sign up for our weekly FJC Newsletter, visit our website or contact us at [email protected].