View as Webpage

TORAH PORTION: TETZAVE

Parashat Tetzave

February 24, 2024 | 15 Adar I 5784

Torah: Exodus 27:20–30:10 Triennial: Exodus 28:31–29:18

Haftarah: Ezekiel 43:10–27

We believe that in times of great strife, words of Torah can provide stability and comfort in our lives.

We know that you join us in praying for the safety of our soldiers and citizens, and that together we mourn the terrible losses already suffered.

We stand together for a strong and secure Israel.

In this week's Torah Sparks, you'll find a D'var Torah on the Torah portion by Bex Stern-Rosenblatt called "Interwoven Texts", Rabbi Daniel Raphael Silverstein asks shares insights from Hassidut in a video titled "The Essence of the Mishkan", and Rabbi Joshua Kulp continues his series of essays on the Halakhot of Pesah in a piece called "Does One Have to Clean The House If Traveling Before Pesah?".

Choose a Torah Sparks Subscription!
Download TORAH SPARKS Printer-Friendly File

D'VAR TORAH

Interwoven Texts

Bex Stern-Rosenblatt

Parashah



There are only three stories in the Tanakh in which the root ש.ב.ץ. appears. It occurs most prominently in our parashah, describing the settings or the borders for Aaron’s attire. The names of the twelve tribes are set in golden משבצות, assiduously fastened to the rest of his garb. The root also appears in Psalm 45, a most unusual psalm, which seems to describe a royal wedding, with specific instructions to the bride. There, we read of this bride: “all the honor of the daughter of a king is interior, her clothing ממשבצות with gold.”  The only other appearance of the root is in 2 Samuel 1, in the reported speech of King Saul asking to be killed after he has fallen in battle because שבץ has taken a hold of him.  


On the surface, these three occurrences share no similarities. The word means something like to interweave - appropriate for talking of clothing or of the pain of a body breaking down during death. Yet there is a long tradition of finding a way of relating these three stories, of making these three stories, these three places in which the root occurs, say something fundamental about priesthood. 


Psalm 45 is a love song. It declares itself as such in its opening verse. It can be read even as a bawdy love song, with innuendo about what will happen to consummate the marriage. But because of the presence of the root שבץ (and our general discomfort with innuendo,) the psalm is read instead to be about the proper role of a bride, the way a woman should behave. Even as the psalm describes the beauty of the woman and the way she attires herself, the text is interpreted in the Talmud (Yevamot 77a, among other places) to insist that women should not be seen, should not appear outside the house when avoidable. “The honor of the daughter of a king is interior” - a woman should stay inside, should shut herself away from prying eyes. A woman should be modest above all else. Vayikra Rabbah 20 explicitly connects the modesty of a woman to the high priesthood. The woman merits to have her sons become the high priests because she never uncovered her hair, not even in her own house. 


The interpretation of the golden משבצות in Psalms 45 as connected to modesty, to internal characteristics, invites us to reinterpret the word in Aaron’s context. Even as the high priest is covered in fine gems, precious jewels, and interwoven gold, so too must Aaron’s honor remain interior. So much of Aaron’s life, of his sons and descendants lives, will be about being the living clothes rack for the priestly garments. Before he dies, Aaron must strip. When his sons, Nadav and Avihu, are consumed by fire, their garments remain somehow untouched. Despite all that, despite the role the high priest must play in public, his true kavod lies elsewhere. It is not in the garment. It is in the man himself, in his ability to be modest, to conduct himself with dignity even when no one is watching. 


About the word’s appearance in King Saul’s story, Rashi cites Midrash Tanhuma to posit that Saul deserved to die. Saul had ordered the priests of Nob killed. It is only appropriate then that he be killed because שבץ grips him, perhaps even the guilt of killing the priests. Likewise, he begs to be killed by an Amalekite after he much earlier failed to kill all the Amelites as God had told him to do. 


The story of Saul is a tragedy. A promising boy becomes a cursed king. A strong and beautiful lad is driven to madness and nearly destroys his own country in his desperation to stay in power. He who was chosen by God is abandoned by God. 


The tragedy of Saul allows us to read the tragedy inherent in being the high priest. These people too are gripped by שבץ. These are people who will sacrifice their individuality in order to become able to serve as symbols of the entire nation. These people will be in uncomfortably close relation with God because nobody else wants to do it. Upon assuming the framing, upon donning his clothes, the high priest can never go back to just being Aaron, your buddy from down in Egypt. Yet, somehow, the high priest must also hold onto the message read into Psalm 45. He must retain who he is in private, exist as an individual only when no one else is watching. He must embody modesty to avoid tragedy.

HASSIDUT

The Essence of the Mishkan

Rabbi Daniel Raphael Silverstein

Insights from Hassidut

Rabbi Daniel Raphael Silverstein on Beshelach

*

Rabbi Daniel Silverstein teaches Hassidut at the CY and directs Applied Jewish Spirituality (www.appliedjewishspirituality.org). In these weekly videos, he shares Hassidic insights on the parashah or calendar.

HALAKHIC ESSAYS ON PESAH

Does One Have to Clean The House If Traveling Before Pesah?

Rabbi Joshua Kulp



Today, many Jews observe Pesah by traveling to another destination before the holiday, to Israel or to some other vacation area, where they will be able to celebrate the Seder without all of the cooking and cleaning at home. This raises the question of whether one must clean one’s home and perform a thorough search for hametz before leaving. Before we examine the relevant material, it is important to note that the way hametz is commonly sold today did not exist before the 17th/18th century. Talmudic discussions also rarely mention “nullification” of hametz. However, unlike the sale of hametz, nullification is mentioned in the Talmud and is integrated into most medieval discussions of biur hametz (we will return to this subject in a later essay).


The issue of leaving home before Pesah is addressed by Rav Yehudah in a source that appears on Pesahim 6a (the source originates in Tosefta Pesahim 1:4): “One who sets sail, or one who departs in a caravan; if he did so thirty days prior to Pesah, he need not destroy the hametz from his possession. If he departs within thirty days of Pesah, he must destroy the hametz.”


According to the simple reading of this halakhah, if one leaves home thirty days before Pesah and she leaves hametz in her home, she need not be concerned about destroying. The Talmud limits this to a case where the person does not come back either before or during Pesah (there is a dispute about this between Rashi and the Rambam). But nevertheless, the rule is surprising–how can it be legal to own hametz on Pesah just because one is nowhere near someone’s home? What about the prohibition of “hametz shall not be found in one’s home during Pesah, called בל ימצא in rabbinic literature? 


We can answer this question both through the lens of critical talmudic study and the lens of the rishonim, the early traditional talmudic commentators. The Tosefta referenced above reads almost the same as the Bavli, with one critical difference: “One who departs with a caravan or sets sail on a ship more than thirty days [before Passover] does not need to search [for hametz].” The Tosefta refers to “searching for hametz” and not “destroying hametz.” The Bavli explains that thirty days before Pesah, one begins to ask about and teach the laws of Pesah. From this point onward, one must begin to make sure that hametz will be destroyed before Pesah comes. Pesach should be on one’s mind within thirty days of the beginning of the holiday. This is Pesah time–to this day, once Purim is over, Pesah is on the horizon. However, if one leaves earlier than that, one need not check for hametz. Pesach is still out of sight and out of mind. However, it is possible that according to the Tosefta, if one knew there was hametz at home, she would have to remove it before leaving. 


This critical solution does not work in the Bavli which explicitly says that if one leaves more than thirty days before Pesah and intends to be away for all of Pesah, there is no need to destroy the hametz. The rishonim find the idea that one would be out traveling the world on Pesah while still owning hametz at home to be completely untenable. To solve the problem, they muster up the solution of mental nullification–”bitul hametz.” Virtually every medieval commentary that addresses the scenario adds in that when the fourteenth of Pesah comes, one must nullify the hametz. For instance, the Sefer Ha-Ittur, a 12th century work from Provence, writes, “[If he leaves] prior to thirty days, he need not destroy [the hametz in his home] and when the time comes, he nullifies it.” Problem solved. 


The Talmud is quite clear that if the person leaves less than thirty days before Pesah, she must check the house and destroy the hametz. However, as I stated above, the practice of de rigueur selling of hametz did not exist prior to a couple of hundred years ago. Even in the generations following the Shulkhan Arukh, the practice had not evolved to where it is now. But today, most Jews sell their hametz before Pesah. Do they need to also perform a check for hametz even though they are leaving there all of their hametz? Rav Eliezer Melamed, the author of Peninei Halakhah, one of the most popular halakhic works in modern Israel, cites lenient and stringent opinions on the question. Those who are lenient point out that since the house is technically owned by a non-Jew already on erev Pesah, the Jewish owner need not check for any hametz that is found in it. But those who are stringent point out that once the thirty day mark arrives, there is a personal obligation for the Jew to check her home. Furthermore, a person should not try to avoid this mitzvah. Rav Melamed advises people not to fully take advantage of this leniency. One should sell most of the rooms of one’s house but leave one room unsold so that in that room she can perform the mitzvah of bedikah before she leaves for her vacation. 


Rav Melamed’s suggestion highlights a central tension that I will address consistently in these essays. The roots of the laws of searching and destroying for hametz arose in a world in which bittul (nullification) was not fully integrated into the halakhic system and selling hametz did not yet exist as a standard practice. The practice of searching and destroying hametz is deeply entrenched in the Jewish observance of Pesah. Indeed, in some ways, the fourteenth of Nissan is a holiday in and of itself. It is the day in which we ritually search for and destroy hametz. While these practices can be avoided through nullification and selling, the question really is–what is Pesah without them?

Support Torah Sparks

 

Do you love Torah Sparks? It's brought to you by The Fuchsberg Jerusalem Center and we rely on your contributions to keep the learning going. Support Torah Sparks by making a donation to FJC or by selecting a subscription below:

Choose a Torah Sparks Subscription!

Access the Torah Sparks Archive

For more information about the Fuchsberg Jerusalem Center, please sign up for our weekly FJC Newsletter, visit our website or contact us at [email protected].