Almost everyone in my district knows Hanscom Field, tucked into the towns of Bedford, Concord, Lexington, and Lincoln. It’s owned and operated by Massport, a public body set up to run in some ways like a private business, which gives it a certain amount of insulation from the influence of elected officials.
Sometimes that’s a good thing. Sometimes it isn’t. Case in point: Private developers are pitching Massport on a massive expansion at Hanscom -- 27 new hangars to house private jets, triple today’s capacity for such aircraft -- and so far the agency seems happy to entertain the deal.
Worried about the climate? If Massport says yes to this, Hanscom, an institution in our own backyard, becomes a super-emitter. Per capita, air travel is the most polluting form of transportation, and private jet travel is -- by far -- the most polluting form of air travel. People who fly by private jet generate up to 7,500 tons of CO2e per year -- dwarfing emissions by the average American by a factor of 100.
Massport sends out press releases about being climate-conscious -- it trumpets going “net zero” in its buildings by 2031 -- but the greenhouse gas effect of new jet flight operations in and out of Hanscom will swamp anything it might do on the ground.
In February, I organized the first group pushback against the agency and its interest in the project. I have a different vision for Massport and, by extension, for state government. I want to see Massachusetts lead the country in greening aviation. As a practical matter, this starts by stopping the hangars.
In the 1970s, under a governor named Frank Sargent, Massachusetts pulled the plug on a major highway project called the Inner Belt, which would have built a mini-Rt.128 through neighborhoods in Brookline, Boston, Cambridge, and Somerville. Highways seemed synonymous with economic progress at the time. Stopping the Inner Belt was hopeless -- until it wasn’t. Grassroots pressure grew and grew. State government heeded the protests and found a way to shut the project down. This set a precedent, one that Massport -- and, by extension, all of today’s state government -- needs to follow on the Hanscom hangars.
|