|
We confess we cannot keep up with the pace of events where tariffs are concerned - 232, 301, steel, aluminum, autos. This entry is, of course, about the 232 tariffs and we'll make two observations-more quotes really. MetalBulletin published an article last Thursday, June 21, which caught our attention for a couple of reasons. First there was the irony of this:
The Chinese steel markets have not been affected too much by the US section 232 tariffs, largely due to the fact that the US is a not a key export destination for China.
Of course, that says nothing about the global effects of China's tremendous overcapacity in steel, but it is eye-catching. And then there was this from
Hiroshige Seko, Japan's Minister for Economy, Trade and Industry on the retaliatory tariffs:
Retaliating with unilateral, non-WTO compliant measures would not benefit any country in the world.
That is not to say that Japan itself might not resort to such measures, but if it does, it will be an action taken in full knowledge of the dilemma posed by the retaliation route as well as the challenges of dealing with the U.S. national security tariffs.
|