|
“The Purge Has Begun”
From: (Active Duty U.S. Military Christian Chaplain and MRFF Client’s email withheld)
Subject: The Purge Has Begun
Date: July 16, 2026 at 11:13:36 AM PDT
To: Mikey Weinstein <mikey@militaryreligiousfreedom.org>
Hi Mikey,
We’ve corresponded before, and I wanted to reach out because I believe the situation has become more concerning.
I’m still writing anonymously because I fear professional repercussions.
I’m becoming increasingly uncomfortable with how “Spiritual Fitness” is being promoted. Despite attempts to frame it as a neutral readiness initiative, Spiritual Fitness is now being presented as inherently religious. Chaplains are increasingly expected to promote it, and the pressure to support its current direction is becoming difficult to ignore.
What concerns me just as much is the atmosphere among senior chaplains. There appears to be an ongoing effort to determine whether subordinate chaplains ideologically align with the Secretary of Defense and the current leadership. No one says it directly, but it has become obvious in meetings and conversations. The messaging is consistent enough that many of us understand what is being rewarded and what is not.
The recently released memorandum changing the Chaplain Corps evaluation system has only intensified my concern.
On its face, I actually agree with the stated objective. Chaplains should be evaluated on ministry competencies rather than generalized officer metrics. However, the memorandum significantly expands the influence of supervisory chaplains over ministry evaluations and, ultimately, promotion potential.
Ordinarily, that might not concern me. But viewed alongside the current direction of Spiritual Fitness, I believe these developments reinforce one another. If those determining what constitutes “effective ministry” also expect alignment with a particular religious or ideological perspective, the evaluation system becomes more than a measure of ministry performance—it becomes a mechanism for shaping the future composition of the Chaplain Corps.
The Chaplain Corps has been here before. Cases such as Adair v. England, Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. Johnson/England, and In re Navy Chaplaincy arose from allegations that evaluations and promotions favored particular theological traditions. While those cases had varying legal outcomes, they demonstrate the institutional risks that emerge when career progression becomes intertwined with religious preferences.
My concern is that we are laying the groundwork for history to repeat itself.
I fear what begins as ideological alignment will eventually become a broader narrowing of who is considered acceptable within the Chaplain Corps. In my view, the first people likely to be affected are chaplains from racial minority backgrounds and minority faith traditions because they are already underrepresented and often lack institutional influence. If that occurs, I believe the narrowing could eventually extend to women who do not fit the preferred leadership model. History also suggests that movements seeking theological conformity rarely remain unified indefinitely. Once outside voices have been marginalized, disagreements often shift inward, and majority denominations begin competing among themselves over whose interpretation, doctrine, or ministry philosophy becomes the accepted standard.
I sincerely hope I’m wrong. But from my perspective, the combination of the Spiritual Fitness initiative and the new evaluation system appears to create a structure that could reward ideological conformity while discouraging theological and cultural diversity. That would be a profound shift for a Chaplain Corps whose mission is to provide for the free exercise of religion across a pluralistic force.
I wanted to make you aware of what I’m seeing firsthand. As always, I ask that you keep my identity strictly confidential.
Respectfully,
(Active Duty U.S. Military Christian Chaplain and MRFF Client’s personal identifiers all withheld)
| 
