Don't underestimate the power of being underestimated. -Tim Fargo

I've often said that one of the biggest advantages in business is to be underestimated.

That might seem like a strange philosophy. Most people want their abilities recognized, their accomplishments appreciated, and their potential acknowledged. They want supervisors, colleagues, and competitors to know what they're capable of doing. There's certainly nothing wrong with that.

But I've always believed there's a unique advantage in having someone underestimate you. When people decide you're not capable of accomplishing something, they establish expectations that you have an opportunity to exceed. They may have already decided what your limitations are without fully understanding what you're doing, what you're learning, or what you might accomplish next.

The interesting part is that you don't have to agree with their assessment.

And there's something particularly satisfying about accomplishing what someone else thought was beyond your reach.

A Difference of Opinion

Early in my career, I was managing a McDonald's restaurant that had been through a disastrous period. By the time we were preparing for an important annual Full Field Inspection, (17 pages, 500 items), things were changing for the better.

My management team and employees were challenging established procedures, improving operations, and finding ways to serve our customers far faster than conventional thinking suggested was possible.

A few weeks before the inspection, I sat down with my supervisor for my performance review. It was not a pleasant conversation. He was extremely critical of my performance, and I silently disagreed with almost everything he said, and verbally disagreed with the overall rating.

To be fair, his criticism wasn't entirely without foundation. He knew about the restaurant's earlier difficulties. But he hadn't spent much time in the restaurant or with me during the preceding months, so he hadn't seen much of the progress we were making. He was still evaluating my performance through the lens of that earlier, difficult period rather than what was happening in the restaurant now.

As the review was coming to an end, he referred to the upcoming inspection and said, somewhat sarcastically, "Well, I guess we'll find out who's right in a couple of weeks."

I looked at him and responded, "Yes, we will."

There wasn't much more to say. He had his assessment, and I had mine. I knew what our team had been doing and had confidence in what we could accomplish. We were going to have an opportunity to demonstrate it.

A few weeks later, the Full Field Inspection took place. Our restaurant delivered total service times of less than 30 seconds per customer and went on to be recognized as one of McDonald's National Stores of the Year from among about 5,000 stories.

But I've never forgotten that exchange during my performance review. And with the benefit of hindsight, the most important part isn't who won the argument. It's why we saw the situation so differently. My supervisor was remembering a period when we struggled. He hadn't been there enough to see how much had changed.

The problem wasn't that he remembered my failures. The problem was that he hadn't observed my progress.

The Advantage of Being Underestimated

Looking back, I could have spent more time defending myself during that review. I could have debated each criticism, explained every change, and tried to persuade my supervisor to reconsider his opinion. But I doubt another argument would have been nearly as convincing as what our team was about to accomplish.

That's what makes being underestimated so interesting. People may overlook your preparation, discount your determination, or assume that because you struggled previously, you are destined to struggle again. Their expectations can lag well behind your actual progress. And when the results finally become visible, the difference can be dramatic.

The weightlifting photo is of a friend, Tiffany, who can lift a significant amount of weight. More than me, and probably more than you. Her talent has always been underestimated, but that hasn't stopped her from championship performances.

Of course, being underestimated doesn't create success. You still have to do the work, make sound decisions, learn from mistakes, and stay with it. And low expectations can sometimes deprive people of opportunities they deserve. I certainly wouldn't recommend deliberately presenting yourself as less capable than you are.

What I would recommend is refusing to let someone else's opinion set the limits of what you attempt. You don't need everyone's confidence to succeed. You need a clear sense of what's possible, a willingness to act, and the persistence to see it through.

The Other Side of the Equation

There's another lesson in this experience, and it may be the more important one for leaders: while being underestimated can become an advantage, underestimating someone else can be a costly mistake.

Over the years, I've supervised hundreds of managers and worked with thousands of employees. Assessing performance, recognizing potential, and helping people develop are central responsibilities of leadership. But our judgments are often shaped by first impressions, earlier failures, communication styles, and past experiences. Those impressions may be useful starting points, but they should never become permanent verdicts.

People learn. They grow. They recover from mistakes. A manager who struggled six months ago may be doing exceptional work today. An employee who hasn't yet demonstrated a particular ability may be developing it right in front of us. If we aren't paying attention, we can miss the transformation.

That's why observation matters. Leaders need to get close enough to the work and the people doing it to recognize what has changed. They need to ask questions, listen, look for evidence, and remain willing to revise their own conclusions. It's not a weakness to change your assessment when the facts change. It's a responsibility.

One of the greatest mistakes a leader can make is placing a ceiling on someone's potential because of an outdated judgment about their performance.

Bringing It Home

I've sometimes wondered what my supervisor thought after that inspection. Did he reconsider his evaluation? Did he recognize how much progress our team had made? I don't know, and it doesn't really matter now.

What matters is the lesson. The best response to being underestimated isn't bitterness or a desire to embarrass the person who doubted you. It's to keep improving and let your results tell the story. And when those results are extraordinary, remember the people who helped produce them. Our restaurant didn't earn national recognition because I won an argument. It earned that recognition because a remarkable team embraced a challenge and refused to accept conventional limits on what could be accomplished.

So if someone underestimates you, don't be too quick to let their opinion define you. You may have an opportunity to surprise them. And if you're a leader, make certain you're observing the people around you closely enough to notice when they are becoming more capable than you once believed.

Being underestimated can be a wonderful advantage. Underestimating someone else can be a terrible mistake.

If you are reading this on a social media platform, click below and you'll automatically receive a 'different' story every week on Wednesday.