Pica Behavior in Acute Care Hospitals: Strategies for Screening and Mitigating Risk of Harm


By Benjamin R. Thomas, PhD and Matthew A. Taylor, PhD

The Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System (PA-PSRS) has received hundreds of event reports describing patients who ingested inedible objects while receiving treatment in acute care hospitals. Some of these event reports specifically reference patients with a diagnosis of pica who experienced serious harm and required surgical intervention. 


What is Pica?  

Pica is a dangerous disorder involving the persistent ingestion of nonfood, foreign bodies (e.g., plastic, coins, hair, fibers, feces, garbage, medical equipment).1 The American Psychiatric Association diagnostic criteria specifies that pica behavior persists over one month and is developmentally inappropriate (i.e., patient is age 2 years or older) and is not part of a culturally/socially accepted practice.1


Pica is underdiagnosed and patient risk factors are not well screened or documented in medical settings.2,3,4,5 Pica behavior most frequently occurs in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders.2,3 Pica is reported in approximately 14%–28% of patients with autism and/or intellectual disabilities and up to 75% of children with sickle cell disease.2,3 Additionally, each of the following are independent risk factors for pica behavior: Children younger than 6 years old, persons with increased severity of intellectual disability, persons with severe social and leisure deficits, and/or those who are institutionalized.2,3,6 Pica is also associated with pregnancy; chronic kidney disease; and psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia, trichotillomania (hair pulling), trichophagia (ingesting hair), excoriation (skin-picking), and dermatophagia (chewing, ingesting skin/nails).1,4


Impact of In-Hospital Pica Behavior on Patients and Care

We reviewed a sample of PA-PSRS event reports about patients with a diagnosis of pica who ingested inedible objects while in an acute care hospital. Based on the event reports, we found that ingestion of inedible objects occurred across a range of areas within the hospitals (e.g., emergency department, cardiac unit, intensive care unit, medical-surgical, pediatric unit, surgical areas). The reports described the following items being ingested by patients: needles, gloves, batteries, intravenous (IV) catheter and lines, peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) lines, jejunostomy tube (J-tube), specimen lid, plastic spoon, diaper, gauze, device lead, glass, paper clip, pen/pencil, straw, toothbrush, and pieces from eyeglasses. Following the ingestion, many patients required invasive and exploratory procedures (e.g., endoscopy, colonoscopy, and laparotomy). Based on PA-PSRS reports and/or prior literature,7,8 pica behavior can lead to disruptions in care and the following health complications: choking, aspiration, pharyngoesophageal ulceration, stricture, gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation, acute weight loss, bezoar formation, parasitic infection, poisoning, or death (e.g., from ingesting a latex glove or sharp-pointed object).

Potential Strategies to Mitigate Risks Associated With Pica Behavior While a Patient Is In-Hospital


Screening

  • Review patient’s medical records for a history of pica and risks of pica behavior: (1) diagnosed pica (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-10-CM] codes F98.3 in children, and F50.89 and/or F50.83 in adults) or undiagnosed pica (i.e., ingestion/swallowing of foreign bodies) and (2) associated diagnoses (e.g., autism, intellectual disabilities, sickle cell disease, schizophrenia, trichotillomania, trichophagia, excoriation, dermatophagia, chronic kidney disease, pregnancy).
  • Interview the patient and/or caregiver to screen for risk of pica behavior. Consider asking the following screening questions: (1) In the past six months, did the patient attempt to chew, eat, or drink something that is not food and should not be consumed?; (2) Outside of the hospital, what are the nonfoods that should not be consumed, but the patient attempts to eat, chew, or drink?; and (3) In a hospital environment, what nonfood item(s) do you think are at risk of being chewed, eaten, or drunk?
  • Use clinical judgement, based on both record review and interview with screening questions, to guide a decision whether to implement safety strategies.

Safety Strategies

  • Assess the area/room during each shift, and then secure and move items of concern.9,10 Regularly evaluate equipment for damage or missing parts, which may have been caused by the patient. 
  • If medical equipment at risk of being ingested is unable to be removed from the patient’s reach, consider using a caregiver or 1:1 sitter who can sit in close proximity to observe the patient and physically block pica behavior, if necessary. Sitting in close proximity and blocking may not be feasible or effective as a sole strategy, so it should be implemented in conjunction with other strategies.5
  • Attain a behavior plan from the community provider or previous admission; if necessary, create a more robust plan. A behavior plan is often developed in consultation with a psychiatrist, psychologist, behavior specialist, and/or applied behavior analyst.5,10
  • Create an enriched environment with pica-safe physical and mental activities to distract the patient from their desire to ingest inedible objects.5 For younger patients and if available, consider an order for a child life specialist who could help with this strategy. Use alternative sources of oral stimulation dependent on the patient’s diagnosis and history, such as snacks or chewy teethers. Staff should seek a consult from an aforementioned specialty or a speech language pathologist or occupational therapist.
  • Use of more restrictive interventions (e.g., mechanical restraint) must be aligned with the patient’s plan of care, governmental regulations, and hospital policy, and authorized and monitored by the appropriate level of clinical staff. 
  • Closely monitor patients with risk of pica behavior throughout their time in a hospital for changes in health condition, which may reflect ingestion of inedible objects prior to admission or a covert occurrence during admission.7,8

Documentation and Care Coordination

  • Document patient and/or caregiver responses to the screening questions about previous pica behaviors and nonfood items at highest risk of being chewed, eaten, or drunk.
  • Document safety strategies implemented and the corresponding results during each shift and for all areas inhabited by the patient.
  • For patients with repeat admissions related to pica behavior, create a referral to mental health providers specializing in pica, challenging behavior, and/or eating disorders.
  • To help create clinical staff awareness during future patient visits, the clinical coder should use the ICD-10-CM codes for pica, which are F98.3 in children (24 months and older) and F50.83 in patients 15 years and older (specify “pica”).


This list of potential strategies was derived from both the cited literature and the first author’s clinical experience. We encourage readers to critically review these potential strategies prior to implementation.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. doi: 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.744053
  2. Fields VL, Soke GN, Reynolds A, et al. Pica, Autism, and Other Disabilities. Pediatrics. 2021;147(2):e20200462. doi:10.1542/peds.2020-0462
  3. Rodrigues N, Shih S, Cohen LL. Pica in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2021;28(1):6-15. doi:10.1007/s10880-019-09671-x
  4. Orozco-González CN, Cortés-Sanabria L, Márquez-Herrera RM, Núñez-Murillo GK. Pica in End-Stage Chronic Kidney Disease: Literature Review. Nefrología (English Edition). 2019;39(2):115-123. doi:10.1016/j.nefroe.2019.03.003
  5. Moline R, Hou S, Chevrier J, Thomassin K. A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Behavioural Treatments for Pica in Youths. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2021;28(1):39–55. doi:10.1002/cpp.2491
  6. Ashworth M, Hirdes JP, Martin L. The Social and Recreational Characteristics of Adults With Intellectual Disability and Pica Living in Institutions. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30(3):512-520. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2008.07.010
  7. Ikenberry SO, Jue TL, Anderson MA, et al. Management of Ingested Foreign Bodies and Food Impactions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(6):1085-1091. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.11.010
  8. McNaughten B, Bourke T, Thompson A. Fifteen-Minute Consultation: The Child With Pica. Arch Dis Child: Educ Pract Ed. 2017;102(5):226-229. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2016-312121
  9. Thomas BR, O’Connor JT. Parent Use of a Safety Checklist to Prevent Their Child’s Pica. Behav Anal Pract. 2023;16(3):879-884. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00798-w
  10. Williams DE, Kirkpatrick-Sanchez S, Enzinna C, Dunn J, Borden-Karasack, D. The Clinical Management and Prevention of Pica: A Retrospective Follow‐up of 41 Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities and Pica. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2009;22(2):210-215. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00490.x

Title: Keys to Investigation: Now What?

Date: Tuesday, December 17, 2024

Time: 12 to 12:30 p.m.


Attend an informative webinar on “Keys to Investigation: Now What?” with Melanie Motts, patient safety advisor at the Patient Safety Authority. She will identify when an event investigation should be conducted and what resources and tools are needed to complete a thorough and credible event investigation, and explain how to utilize the investigation findings to enhance patient safety work.


0.50 continuing education hours will be awarded for completion of this course. Continuing education credits apply to Pennsylvania registered nurses only.

Register Now

New Education Resource: C. auris 10-Part Video Series for Healthcare


As part of their ongoing work to prevent and contain novel and targeted multidrug-resistant organisms, the Division of Healthcare Associated Infection Prevention (HAIP) in the Bureau of Epidemiology at the Pennsylvania Department of Health (DOH) has developed a 10-part video series on Candida auris.


Each video is three to 12 minutes in length and is intended to train healthcare personnel on this emerging fungus. In addition to videos targeted to any healthcare personnel type, there are videos in this series specifically intended for frontline nursing, physicians, environmental services staff, and laboratorians.


The videos are available to view on the DOH website at health.pa.gov/caurisvideo. HAIP encourages healthcare leadership to incorporate these videos into their training plans for internal and external staff, as C. auris remains an urgent public health threat.


Additional C. auris resources can be found at HAIP’s Healthcare Professional Resources page. You may reach their team at RA-DHHAI@pa.gov.

Preventing Pediatric Falls


While analyzing falls reports for a hospital’s pediatric inpatient unit, a nurse manager recognized that the fall rate exceeded the nationwide benchmark for falls with injury. Although reducing pediatric falls is difficult, since falls in children are often related to normal development, the nurse manager and staff were committed to the goal of reducing their occurrence to beat the benchmark for Magnet-designated facilities. As adult activities were not applicable in the pediatric population, the team reviewed the literature and developed a new bundle of action items with parents, which includes staff working with parents to review a Get Well Network “Monster” video that describes the risk of falls in children in the hospital; a child-focused fall prevention poster in every patient room which reinforces safety; and a “Safety Contract” for parents and family to sign, which stays in the patient room for the entire stay and outlines key actions that parents or extended family members agree to do with their children while they are in the hospital to ensure their safety.

Read more stories about event reports that inspired change