If Elliott’s retreat from a proxy contest with Salesforce this week sounds familiar, it’s because it mirrors a similar ending earlier this year between Disney and Nelson Peltz. As with Peltz’s decision to end his battle with the Magic Kingdom, Elliott’s withdrawal at Salesforce came after a strong earnings cycle and swift strategic changes, including dissolving its M&A committee and doubling share buybacks. Even still, Salesforce may not be fully out of the woods. While the tech company made some concessions to activists earlier this year, including adding a ValueAct nominee to its board, the WSJ’s Dean Seal reports that both Starboard and Inclusive Capital were among the activists mounting pressure on the tech giant. Though it’s still early in proxy season, Reuters’ Svea Herbst Bayliss pointed out that it’s already the third time this year that a prominent activist campaign ended prematurely, citing Peltz at Disney and Loeb at Bed Bath & Beyond.
If the broader tech industry says anything about Salesforce’s fate, expect layoffs and other potential cost-cutting measures designed to boost profitability. The company was in growth mode over the past several years, including deals to acquire Slack (2021) and Tableau (2019), but as JPMorgan’s Anu Aiyengar echoed at the Tulane University Corporate Law Institute last week, investor tides have turned to prioritizing profitability over growth.
Activity is also kicking up in Asia. The Deal’s Ron Orol reports on the ongoing contest ValueAct is waging across the globe at Seven & i, the Japan-based owner of 7-Eleven. Newly minted with his board seat at Salesforce, Mason Morfit has turned his firm’s sights to the convenience store chain, arguing that a spinoff from Seven & i would increase shareholder value by 80% over the next decade. While ValueAct hasn’t revealed the names of the dissident nominees, more details are likely to surface in the lead up to Seven & i's annual meeting in May.
Before we go, we wanted to leave you with a few highlights from GPP’s Tulane Corporate Law Institute Conference panel on M&A and the media last Friday featuring deal reporters Laura Cooper (WSJ), Lauren Hirsch (NYT), Liz Hoffman (Semafor), and Berkeley Law professor Steven Davidoff Solomon. Among the insightful commentary was a conversation on the press’ treatment of Sam Bankman Fried (see the slide below). Cooper and Hirsch, both former trade publication reporters, lauded the journalists at Coin Desk for breaking in-depth stories about SBF, noting that trade reporters’ deep, industry-specific knowledge was critical in uncovering the truth at FTX. The panel also debated the Elon-Twitter deal, stakeholder capitalism, and whether everyone besides shareholders got the short end of the stick. Semafor’s Hoffman buttoned it up by noting that at the end of the day, a Board’s ultimate responsibility is to answer to shareholders, which is what Twitter’s Board did in getting a good price from Elon Musk.
Have a great weekend,
GPP Team
|