Lantern Wealth Advisors, LLC
35 Pinelawn Road
Suite 101E
Melville, NY 11747
(631) 454-2000

Major Indexes For Week Ended 6/7/2019

Index Close Net Change % Change YTD YTD %
DJIA 25,983.94 +1,168.90 4.71 +2,656.48 11.39
NASDAQ 7,742.10 +288.95 3.88 +1,106.82 16.68
S&P500 2,873.34 +121.28 4.41 +366.49 14.62
Russell 2000 1,514.39 +48.90 3.34 +165.83 12.30
International 1,875.62 +58.23 3.20 +155.74 9.06
10-year bond 2.08% -0.06% -0.61%
30-year T-bond 2.57% -0.01% -0.45%
International index is MSCI EAFE index. Bond data reflect net change in yield, not price. Indices are unmanaged and you cannot directly invest in an index.

Amid Signs Of Weakness, Fed Reverses Course; Stocks Rally

Uniformly positive economic fundamentals of early May suddenly turned mixed, the Federal Reserve abruptly reversed course, and stocks rallied this past week. Here's what's happening.

The yield curve inverted on May 14th, and inversion has preceded every recession since 1954, according to independent economist, Fritz Meyer.

The yield curve is the difference between the rate at which the Fed lends to banks and the rate on a 10-year U.S. Treasury bond. Since banks make money by borrowing from the Fed at the three-month T-Bill rate and lending it at a longer-term rate, the inversion destroys a bank's incentive to lend, and economic activity slows.

The yield curve on June 6th (red line) shows that three-month Treasury bill was 2.33% versus the 2.12% on the 10-year Treasury Bond.

Just six months earlier, on January 5th, the yield curve was steep. The black line shows the three-month T-bill rate was 1.39% and the 10-year rate was 2.47%. A sharp rise in short-term rates concurrent with a decline in long-term rates has caused the inversion.

The last inversion of the yield curve (gray line) preceded the recession of 2007.

Not every inversion of the yield curve causes a recession. For example, the inversion in June 1998 was met by a critical course correction by the Fed and the expansion continued for nearly three more years.

Federal Reserve Chairman, Jerome Powell, in delivering opening remarks on June 4th at a conference hosted by the Chicago Federal Reserve District, reversed course.

Following the breakdown in U.S.-China trade talks and the announcement by President Trump of a threatened tariff on imports from Mexico, the Fed chair reassured markets.

"I'd like first to say a word about recent developments involving trade negotiations and other matters," said Mr. Powell, before delivering his planned speech on longer-term policy matters. "We do not know how or when these issues will be resolved. We are closely monitoring the implications of these developments for the U.S. economic outlook and, as always, we will act as appropriate to sustain the expansion, with a strong labor market and inflation near our symmetric 2% objective."

Barely a month has passed since the Fed said that it was holding rates where they stood and did not expect to ease.

"The Committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 2.25% to 2.5%," said Mr. Powell, in the bi-monthly Federal Open Market Committee statement. "The Committee continues to view sustained expansion of economic activity, strong labor market conditions, and inflation near the Committee's symmetric 2% objective as the most likely outcomes."

The abrupt reversal, of course was what the stock market wanted to hear.

The Atlanta Federal Reserve's real-time model for forecasting the current rate of growth of the economy plunged. From a 3.1% growth rate in the first quarter of 2019, the GDPNow forecast for the second-quarter on Friday stood at 1.5%. The economy is slowing.

Also on Friday, the Labor Department said the economy added 75,000 net new jobs in May, which was much less than the 180,000 expected. It followed April's very strong 263,000 new jobs, which beat the 190,000 estimate. Job formation slumped dramatically preceding the last two recessions. Unemployment in May remained at a low last seen in December 1969.

May's weak new-jobs estimate from the Labor Department was corroborated by ADP's monthly estimate of new-job formation.

Meanwhile, manufacturers reported less activity. The Institute of Supply Managers index of purchasing activity at large manufacturing companies ticked down to 52.1 from April's 52.8. But May's new orders sub-index ticked up to 52.7 from April's 51.7, and manufacturing is historically a volatile business.

The much more important ISM index of purchasing activity at companies not in the manufacturing sector ticked up in May to 56.9 from April's 55.5, and May's new orders ticked up to 58.6 from April's 58.1. Since non-manufacturing accounts for about 88% of U.S. economic activity, that was good news.

Despite the cloud of uncertainty created by the possibility of higher costs of imports from Mexico, the Standard & Poor's 500 index gained 1.1% for the week, regaining some footing lost last week. Stocks were just 3% off the all-time high of April 30th and closed the week at 2,873.34.

The economy has been expanding for 119 consecutive months and is within days of becoming the longest of expansion in modern U.S. history. Current fundamentals are strong, with the U.S. Leading Economic Indicators recently ticking higher, unemployment at a 50-year low, benign inflation and surging productivity. But uncertainty is also high and stock-price volatility should be expected.

This article was written by a veteran financial journalist based on data compiled and analyzed by independent economist, Fritz Meyer. While these are sources we believe to be reliable, the information is not intended to be used as financial or tax advice without consulting a professional about your personal situation. Tax laws are subject to change. Indices are unmanaged and not available for direct investment. Investments with higher return potential carry greater risk for loss. No one can predict the future of the stock market or any investment, and past performance is never a guarantee of your future results.

How You Can Manage Risk Aversion

During the early part of 2017, the stock market was rolling merrily along, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) breaking through the 20,000-point barrier for the first time. But the "Trump bump" won't last forever and some prognosticators are forecasting eventual doom and gloom. In all likelihood, the stock market will continue to experience ups and downs, just like it has throughout its history.

Regardless of whether the market is going up or down, or staying relatively stable, your portfolio should reflect your personal aversion to risk. Primarily, there are three types of risk to address in this overall philosophy:

1. Risk of loss of principal: This is the risk of losing the money you initially invested. Say you buy a stock for $1,000 that jumps to $1,200 before it falls back to $900. If you sell the stock at that point, you will have lost $100 of principal.

2. Risk of loss of purchasing power: You may be willing to limp along with modest returns, but you're losing money if the inflation rate exceeds your rate of return. For instance, if you acquire a bank CD paying a 2% annual rate and inflation rises to 3.5%, you're losing 1.5% in the purchasing power of that investment.

3. Risk of outliving your savings: Is your investment plan overly conservative? Remember that the stock market historically has outperformed most comparable investments over long periods, although there are no absolute guarantees. Therefore, you're likely to fare better with a well-devised investment plan than you would if you stuffed your money under a mattress. Otherwise, you might outlive your savings, especially given recent increases in life expectancies.

Risk assessment surveys can provide some insights. Typically, an analysis will reveal that you tend to be either a conservative, moderate, or aggressive investor, within certain ranges. Your portfolio should reflect this characterization.

If you indicate a more conservative bent, you may want to fine-tune your investments accordingly, taking into account asset allocation and diversification methods. Again, these strategies do not offer any guarantees, nor do they protect against losses in declining markets, but they remain fundamentally sound.

Other potential ideas are to weight your portfolio more heavily to bonds than you did in your younger days. The technique of "bond laddering," with bonds maturing at different dates, is a variation on this theme. Similarly, conservative investors may emphasize dividend-paying stocks and blue chips, as well as mutual funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs) offering diversification.

Every situation is different. Reach out to us to address your specific concerns.

The above referenced information was obtained from reliable sources, however Lantern Investments, Inc. and Lantern Wealth Advisors, LLC cannot guarantee its accuracy. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Asset allocation and diversification do not assure a profit or protect against losses in declining markets. Any information given on the site is informational and illustrative but does not recommend actions as the information may not be appropriate to all situations. It is important that you consider your tolerance for risk and investment goals when making investment decisions. Investing in securities does involve risk and the potential of losing money. Links to other sites are provided for your convenience. Lantern Wealth Advisors, LLC and Lantern Investments, Inc. do not endorse, verify or attest to the accuracy of the content of the web sites that are linked and accept no responsibility for their use or content. Lantern Wealth Advisors, LLC and Lantern Investments, Inc. do not provide tax, accounting or legal advice.