Aligned Grey and White.png


Weekly Update



March 6, 2026

Missouri early literacy overhaul takes shape

Two bills advance Missouri’s early literacy framework


Missouri lawmakers are advancing major early literacy reforms in both chambers this session:


  • HB 2872 tightens teacher preparation standards, formalizes intervention requirements, and clarifies retention guidelines.
  • SB 1442 is in many ways like the house bill, but establishes a single statewide reading screener, creates funding incentives for student improvement, and makes third grade retention automatic at the lowest performance level.


These bills are the culmination of many aiming towards a similar goal: building a system to identify struggling readers early, responding to their needs decisively, and striving for third grade proficiency to become the norm for every student. 


Both pieces of legislation can be understood through three core pillars of early literacy reform: prevention, intervention, and retention. Each answers a simple question:


  • How do we stop creating reading gaps?
  • What do we do when students fall behind?
  • And what happens if they do not catch up?


Prevention: Getting instruction right the first time


Prevention is about getting instruction right the first time, so we can make sure that teachers, instructional materials, and screening systems are aligned before students fall behind.


The pair of bills would require teacher preparation programs to teach evidence-based reading instruction. They would also prohibit colleges from teaching the three-cueing, a discredited teaching method that Missouri barred from being a “primary instructional method.”


Lawmakers target teacher prep programs in these ways because prevention is cheaper and more durable than remediation: if every new K-3 teacher enters their classrooms trained in structured literacy, then fewer students should need intervention later.


These bills would also keep a statewide literacy plan and an Office of Literacy to ensure that mandates without state capacity avoid uneven implementation across districts.


Where the bills diverge: screening students.


  • The Senate proposal requires a single statewide screener to standardize expectations and make results comparable across districts.
  • The House proposal allows state-approved screening options, likely to reduce disruption for districts already using tools and to avoid a backlash.


The tradeoff is straightforward: uniformity allows comparability; flexibility makes comparison harder but may improve buy-in and fidelity over time.


However, even the strongest prevention systems cannot eliminate reading gaps entirely. Screening will help us understand what students need additional support.


Intervention: Action after identification


Once a student is identified, what must a school, teacher, and a student’s parents do to help them catch up? More formal intervention methods and requirements can help answer that question. 


  • Both chambers’ proposals would continue the use of Reading Success Plans for students in need of support. They both require parent notification, regular progress monitoring, and evidence-based instruction options including tutoring, small-group instruction, extended learning time, and summer programs.


The two bills require defined instructional responses. The Senate proposal goes one step further by attempting to reward improvement over time.


  • The Senate bill provides a unique financial incentive (subject to funding) of $500 per student who had reading deficiencies in grades K-3 but reached proficiency in fourth grade. Measures like this are lawmakers’ way to signify that growth towards increased proficiency matters.


When prevention and intervention succeed, retention becomes unnecessary. When they do not, lawmakers must decide how firmly the system responds at the end of third grade.


Retention: Clear stakes, different applications


Retention is fundamentally a guardrail in the framework. The policy sets clear expectations that students must read proficiently before moving into fourth grade.


While both bills make the question of promoting or retaining third grade students more explicit, they differ on who makes the decision:


  • The House bill strengthens the existing consultive model by tying retention decisions to standardized screener results, requiring documentation and parent notification. It also limits promotion when a student remains significantly below grade level. These changes preserve local judgement within clearer guardrails
  • The Senate bill makes retention automatic for students performing at the lowest level (unless they qualify for a narrow exemption), which prioritizes clarity and uniform enforcement.


Each approach to promotion/retention elevates the stakes; they differ practically in how much discretion local educators have in the decision-making process.


Ultimately, success will depend on whether prevention and intervention methods are strong enough, and implemented with fidelity across the state, to make retention exceptional and rare.


Aligned's Take: In our K-3 Literacy Policy Brief, Aligned made the case that lasting gains require a coherent prevention-intervention-retention framework. The bills advancing this year bring and strengthen that structure into law. The debate now is about how we design and communicate each pillar of the system, and whether the framework works together in practice.

Kansas News

Kansas explores innovative assessment pilot under federal flexibility


Kansas lawmakers heard testimony this week on a potential new direction for student assessment, one designed to better connect testing with classroom instruction while still meeting state and federal accountability requirements.


Dr. Zach Conrad of Kansas City, Kansas Public Schools and Dr. Jonathan Templin of Innovative Assessment Solutions presented a model built around shorter, standards aligned benchmark assessments administered throughout the school year.


Their pitch was simple: Instead of relying primarily on a single end-of-year exam, the approach aims to provide faster, more actionable feedback for educators while still producing reliable signals about student performance for accountability purposes.


The discussion comes as the Kansas State Department of Education prepares to apply for approval under the Innovative Assessment Demonstration Authority (IADA), a federal provision in the Every Student Succeeds Act that allows states to pilot alternative assessment models while maintaining accountability requirements. KSDE intends to submit its application by March 17, and if approved, the pilot could run for up to five years.


What the proposed model aims to do


Rather than relying primarily on a single end-of-year state test, the system would use quarterly benchmark assessments aligned to Kansas standards and local instructional pacing.


Key elements of the proposal include:


  • Shorter assessments that are administered multiple times during the year to monitor student learning progress.
  • Rapid turnaround of results, potentially within days rather than months.
  • Reporting at the level of specific academic standards, allowing teachers to identify learning gaps and adjust instruction more quickly.
  • Statistical linking to state assessments, allowing benchmark results to reliably predict performance on statewide tests.


Dr. Conrad noted that versions of this system are already being used in districts such as Kansas City, Kansas Public Schools and Olathe Public Schools, where educators are working to align interim assessments more closely with instructional materials and classroom pacing.


The goal is to provide teachers with assessment results quickly enough to inform instruction during the school year rather than after it ends.


Dr. Templin presented early data suggesting the model can produce results that closely align with Kansas assessment outcomes. By connecting district benchmark assessments with statewide measures, the system aims to provide a more continuous picture of student progress while still supporting the state’s accountability framework.


Why this matters


Kansas is one of several states exploring how assessment systems can provide more useful information for instruction without abandoning statewide accountability. Through the IADA authority, states can pilot assessment systems that distribute testing across the school year rather than concentrating it in a single testing window.


If Kansas’ application is approved, the pilot would allow the state to evaluate whether a more instructionally aligned assessment model can both support classroom decision-making and meet federal accountability requirements.


Kansas Senate advances bell-to-bell cell phone ban for schools


On Thursday, the Kansas Senate approved legislation requiring public schools and certain accredited private schools to adopt bell-to-bell restrictions on student cell phone use during the school day.


The Senate approved the bill 32–4 and now returns to the House for consideration of the Senate’s changes.


As amended in the Senate, the proposal would require schools to prohibit students from using or accessing personal electronic communication devices from the start of the school day until dismissal, including during lunch, recess, and passing periods. Devices would need to be turned off and securely locked or stored in a location inaccessible to students.


During the Senate Education Committee’s work on the proposal, lawmakers adopted several amendments that reshaped the bill before advancing it.


One amendment clarified what schools would be subject to the policy. The amendment defined “accredited” schools for the purposes of the legislation as nonpublic schools accredited by the Kansas State Board of Education. Schools that hold dual accreditation, such as those accredited by KSDE and another regional or national accrediting body, would still be subject to the policy.


A second amendment addressed several operational details raised during earlier hearings. Namely, it shifted the prohibition from “instructional time” to the broader “school day,” added language clarifying that exceptions for students with individualized education programs must be a last resort, and included provisions governing how schools and employees communicate with students online.


Following adoption of the amendments, the committee voted to remove the contents of House Bill 2299 and insert the revised language of the cell phone proposal, effectively converting the legislation into a Senate substitute for the House bill.


The bill now returns to the Kansas House of Representatives, which passed similar legislation in mid-February. With Governor Laura Kelly and legislative leadership in both chambers publicly supportive, the proposal appears well positioned for final passage.


If enacted, Kansas would join 35 states and D.C. that have adopted policies restricting student cell phone use during the school day.


Priority bill update


We’ve also updated our Kansas priority bill tracker with the latest committee action and floor movement on key education legislation.


In other news


Missouri News

Missouri House advances A-F school accountability


On Thursday, the Missouri House or Representatives passed HB 2710 (96-53) to create a new statewide accountability system that would assign every public school and district an A-F grade.


The bill now moves to the Senate and, if passed and signed by the Governor, would create annual school accountability report cards designed to present school performance in a clear and accessible format for families and the public.


The legislation follows an executive order from Governor Mike Kehoe directing the state to develop a letter-grade accountability system, and lawmakers have moved to shape the structure of that system through statute rather than leaving the details entirely to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE).


The proposed system would rely on a mix of academic achievement and student growth.


  • For elementary and middle schools, ratings would combine student proficiency on state assessments with two growth measures: value-added growth and a “growth relative to grade level” metric designed to determine whether students are on track to reach grade-level performance within several years.
  • High school ratings would also incorporate additional indicators such as graduation rates and a “success-ready graduate” measure, which includes factors like Advanced Placement performance, dual enrollment completion, and the attainment of industry-recognized credentials.


The legislation also includes a separate school climate rating based on suspension rates and satisfaction surveys of students, parents, and teachers.


Debate in the House reflected the broader policy conversation around school accountability systems.


Some lawmakers expressed concern that letter grades could oversimplify school performance or create unintended pressure on schools serving students that need additional support. Proponents of the bill argued that clearer and more transparent information about school outcomes is necessary for families, policymakers, and communities.


Aligned’s Take: Missouri’s current accountability reporting system contains a great deal, but much of it is difficult for families and the public to interpret. A well-designed A–F system can make school performance more transparent while still incorporating multiple measures of student growth and achievement. Done thoughtfully, it can help focus attention on student outcomes and ensure that accountability remains a central part of improving Missouri’s education system.


Priority bill update


Our Missouri tracker has been updated as priority bills continue moving through both chambers.


In other news


Wichita Advisory Board member Bradley Richards leads discussion at a recent meeting.

Local spotlight

Advancing kindergarten readiness and third grade reading in Wichita


Aligned stays closely connected to impactful local work through our regional advisory boards.


In Wichita, Advisory Board member Bradley Richards introduced us to these initiatives and invited us into the conversation.


We are grateful to Bradley and Wichita Collective Impact for leading this work and keeping us meaningfully engaged in these important efforts. Partnerships like these strengthen both local efforts and statewide impact and help ensure collaboration translates into measurable results for students.


Aligned is actively participating in both the Kindergarten Readiness Committee and the Third Grade Reading Committee as part of a growing, community-wide effort to strengthen early learning outcomes in Wichita. These committees bring together early childhood providers, schools, nonprofits, libraries, civic leaders, and community organizations to align around shared goals and measurable outcomes.


The focus is clear: improve kindergarten readiness and third grade reading proficiency to expand long-term academic success and economic opportunity.


The Kindergarten Readiness Committee is working to ensure children arrive at school with strong early literacy and numeracy skills, social-emotional competence, consistent attendance, and fewer behavioral interventions.


Its strategies include increasing caregiver awareness of kindergarten readiness expectations, supporting families as first teachers, coordinating readiness programming across organizations, and strengthening provider capacity through shared tools and professional development.


The Third Grade Reading Committee is similarly focused on reviewing objectives, evaluating strategies, and prioritizing implementation to ensure students reach reading proficiency by the end of third grade. This work emphasizes collaboration, data-informed decision-making, and coordinated action across partners.


While these efforts are rooted in Wichita, there is strong interest in growing the framework statewide. We look forward to continuing to support this work and sharing updates as it evolves.

Thanks for reading our weekly update!







Torree Pederson

President

torree@wearealigned.org


Eric Syverson

Vice President of Policy & Research

erics@wearealigned.org

About Aligned


Aligned is the only state-wide non-profit, nonpartisan business group working in Kansas and Missouri on educational issues impacting the full development of our children, from supporting high-quality early learning to solid secondary programs that provide rigorous academic programs and real-world learning opportunities.


Our vision is that our public education systems in Kansas and Missouri have the resources and flexibility to prepare students to pursue the future of their choice.


We are currently focused on education policies that will strengthen early childhood systems, expand the teacher workforce, modernize school finance, improve literacy, accelerate data and accountability systems, and support safe, focused learning environments.


Learn more about our work.