During this time of unprecedented professional and personal uncertainty, we want to assure you that we will continue to provide the same uninterrupted, high-quality service that you are accustomed to. We remain operational and available to answer any questions.
Our top priority is focusing on guiding our families, clients, businesses, and colleagues through these unchartered waters.
As a statewide group, collectively we are looking toward the future and considering the current and potential impacts of COVID-19 on the land development industry. We are working hard to help you navigate the many novel and complex business and legal issues that are arising.
In addition to the new federal, state and local government actions which we are tracking here, below please find "developing" laws and regulations from the 2020 legislative session and recent court decisions that we are monitoring.
|
IMPORTANT LAND DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES FOLLOWING FLORIDA'S 2020 LEGISLATIVE SESSION |
Legislators filed 3,518 bills during the 2020 Florida Legislative Session, but only 210 of the bills introduced passed. A number of these bills were related to environmental and land use issues. We expect all bills to be presented to the Governor in the coming months for his consideration. Once a bill is presented, the Governor has 15 days to take action.
Important bills from the 2020 legislative session related to land development and environmental issues include the following:
Limitations on Impact Fee Assessment, and Impact Fee Credits Made More Useful:
Senate Bill 1066 prohibits local governments from imposing new or increased impact fees on current or pending applications submitted before the effective date of the ordinance or resolution imposing the new or increased fee. Additionally, impact fee credits can be assigned and transferred from one development or parcel to any other development or parcel within the same impact fee zone or district, or an adjoining impact fee zone or district within the same local government jurisdiction that receives a benefit from the improvement generating the credits.
Local Governments May Approve Affordable Housing within Parcels Zoned Residential, Commercial, or Industrial:
House Bill 1339 addresses several issues affecting zoning, bonding activities, impact fees, building inspections, and affordable housing.
The bill authorizes local governments to create a linkage fee for the purpose of funding affordable housing, and provides that certain developers are entitled to a full offset of the fee. It allows local governments to approve affordable housing development in any parcel zoned for residential, commercial, or industrial use. The bill clarifies that experience with the Florida Housing Finance Corporation is not required for financing under the State Apartment Incentive Loan program. The bill also requires local governments to report impact fee data and affordable housing expenditures, and prohibits local governments from auditing a private building inspector more than four times per month. House Bill 1339 also expands current bonding abilities under the Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act of 1969 to permit loans to private entities with self-liquidating projects, regardless of the entity's location.
Blue-Green Algae Task Force Recommendations Adopted:
Senate Bill 0712 will be known as the "Clean Waterways Act." Responding to concerns such as red tide and blue-green algae accumulations which compromised our state surface waters in recent years, this bill addresses onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems (OSTDSs, commonly referred to as septic systems), wastewater, stormwater, agriculture, and biosolids. For many of these topics, the bill directs the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) to develop implementation rules. Under the bill, local governments would be required to develop remediation plans for OSTDSs within a Basin Management Action Plan area if these systems are determined to contribute 20 percent of the nutrient pollution contributing to the Total Maximum Daily Load. A similar requirement would be in place for local government domestic wastewater facilities. Going forward, the Secretary of the FDEP would only require the Governor and one other cabinet member to approve his or her appointment rather than three cabinet members. Also, among other things, the bill would prohibit local governments from passing laws that would provide legal rights to any plant, animal, water body, or other part of the natural environment unless otherwise authorized by state law or the State Constitution. If Governor DeSantis signs the bill into law, developers, local governments and those with agricultural interests should stay engaged in upcoming rulemaking that may affect their interests. As to developers, the pre-emption of local laws relating to the rights of nature may be beneficial and remove certain impediments to projects.
Key Provisions of Chapter 163 Amended Regarding Comprehensive Plans, Annexation, Development Orders, Development Agreements, and DRIs:
Senate Bill 410 amends Chapter 163, including a prohibition on counties from adopting restrictions that limit a municipality's ability to establish land use and zoning regulations on municipal lands. This prohibition does not apply to counties with more than 750,000 people and a charter governing land use or development for all jurisdictions within the county. This bill also prioritizes small counties and municipalities within such counties for technical assistance funding for evaluating areas near the proposed new toll roads and in amending their comprehensive plans. In addition, newly adopted comprehensive plans must recognize development orders issued prior to the comprehensive plan's adoption and all local governments must adopt a private property rights section in their comprehensive plans. Interestingly, municipalities are only now prohibited from annexing an area within another municipal jurisdiction without that municipality's consent. Senate Bill 410 also allows development agreements to be amended or cancelled without the consent of parcel owners subject to the agreement unless the amendment or cancellation directly modifies the property owner's allowed uses or entitlements. Finally, this bill validates development of regional impact agreements classified as built out, and provides a process for amending those agreements.
Funding Increased for the Petroleum Cleanup Participation Program:
Senate Bill 0702 authorizes the FDEP to use up to $10 million from the Inland Protection Trust Fund each fiscal year to pay for the labor and equipment costs expended to repair or replace petroleum storage systems that may have been damaged due to the storage of fuels blended with ethanol or biodiesels. The bill provides the procedures a petroleum storage system owner or operator must follow to apply for a payment to repair or replace certain petroleum equipment such as tanks and piping. The bill will be retroactive including repairs and replacements dating back to July of 2015. Additionally, the bill adjusts the requirements for the Petroleum Cleanup Participation Program and eliminates the requirement for a Limited Contamination Assessment Report as part of an advanced cleanup application. If this bill is signed into law by Governor DeSantis, then trust funds will be available to petroleum storage system owners and operators to repair or replace damaged petroleum equipment and petroleum program participants will have more options to proceed with site rehabilitation using state funded cleanups.
New Negotiation Opportunities Created for Property Owners with Agricultural Land Subject to a Conservation Easement:
Senate Bill 7018 clarifies that property owners with land traditionally used for agriculture that is subject to a conservation easement can voluntarily negotiate their rights in exchange for the construction of any public or private linear facility and right of access. In addition, the bill authorizes the Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT") to plan, design, and construct staging areas at key geographic locations on the turnpike system during a declared state of emergency. The bill also requires FDOT to develop and recommend a master plan for the development of electric vehicle charging station infrastructures along the State Highway System. Additionally, Senate Bill 7018 prevents a utility from being installed, located, or relocated unless authorized by FDOT and the appropriate local government entity issued a written permit.
State-Financed Construction Projects within the Coastal Building Zone Required to Evaluate Sea-Level Impact:
Senate Bill 0178 imposes several new requirements for public financing on construction projects within coastal building zones. Constructors must conduct and submit a sea level impact project ("SLIP") study to the FDEP before commencing construction of a coastal structure. FDEP must initiate rulemaking procedures to develop minimum standards for SLIP studies, and the bill sets forth several required assessments to be included in the SLIP study, including an assessment of the flooding and wave action risks to the coastal structure over its expected life or 50 years, whichever is less.
Limitations on What Local Governments can Require of Private Property Owners and Private Contractors:
House Bill 0073 requires contracts and requests for proposals between local governments and residential recycling collectors and recovered materials processing facilities to include provisions addressing the collection, transportation, and processing of contaminated recyclable material. The bill allows local governments to define "contaminated recyclable material." Additionally, the bill prohibits local governments from requiring a person to provide additional verification from the FDEP for certain construction projects if that project is exempt from having to receive an environmental resource permit from the state. Lastly, the bill allows replacement docks or piers to be constructed within 5 feet of the same location of an existing dock or pier so long as the replacement is not larger in size and does not adversely and permanently impact aquatic resources.
Civil Penalties Increased for Environmental Infractions:
House Bill 1091 encourages local governments to establish a sanitary sewer lateral inspection program by July 1, 2022. Additionally, the bill requires a seller of real property to disclose any known defects in the property's sanitary sewer lateral to a prospective purchaser before executing a contract for sale. Lastly, the bill increases the civil penalties of several provisions relating to pollution and the environment. For a full list of all the statutory fine changes please click
here.
Location of Endangered Species in Florida Exempt from Public Records Requirements:
House Bill 0549 creates an exemption in Florida public record laws for site-specific location information of endangered species. The exemption does not apply to site-specific location information for animals held in captivity.
From the beginning, the members of our Land Development, Zoning & Environmental Practice Group and our Director of Government Affairs have been involved in tracking legislation and impacting (including drafting) for clients many of the above bills. We will continue to provide legislative updates as the Governor takes action on the over 200 bills that passed. For more information on any of the issues discussed here, please
contact us.
|
LEGAL UPDATE
|
Second DCA Affirms that County's Wetland Easement Requirements Constitute a Per Se Taking, but Rejects Argument that the Ordinance Requiring a Grant of Easement is Facially Unconstitutional
In 1990, as part of its required Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code, Manatee County instituted several protections for wetlands. These requirements included property owners creating buffers around wetlands and property owners granting easements to the County so that it can confirm compliance with the wetland code requirements. In 2012-four years after significantly developing its property-a developer requested compensation for the grant of the required conservation easement, which the County denied. The trial court ruled in favor of the developer on both a claim that the County's ordinance was facially unconstitutional and that the required easement was a compensable per se taking. The Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower Court's decision regarding the per se taking, but reversed the lower court's decision on the constitutionality of the ordinance because the statute of limitations had already run its course for a facial constitutional challenge.
View More
|
First DCA Holds That Local Governments are Empowered to Totally Ban Rental Scooters Within Their Jurisdiction Under Certain Conditions
Panama City Beach ("City") enacted two ordinances which (1) prohibited the overnight rental of motorized scooters and (2) completely prohibited the renting of motorized scooters effective September 2020. Classy Cycles brought suit to challenge the ordinances' validity on the grounds that the ordinances had no rational basis and were preempted by state law. The First District Court of Appeals ruled that (1) the ordinances had a rational basis because the City was addressing a citywide safety concern, and (2) the City could regulate scooters because the Florida Uniform Traffic Code ("FUTC") gave cities the power to regulate classes and kinds of traffic. The decision inspired a dissent, which argued that the FUTC did not empower cities to regulate the manner that scooters are made available to the public.
View More
|
Eleventh Circuit Holds That Certain Private Property Owners Have Sufficient Personal Knowledge to Testify Regarding the Future Value of Their Property
Sabal Trail Transmission ("Sabal") acquired easements under a portion of Sunderman Grove's ("Sunderman") private property through eminent domain pursuant to the federal Natural Gas Act ("NGA") in order to construct and operate an underground natural gas pipeline. The owner of Sunderman and Sabal could not agree to the price of the property, and during trial, the owner proffered testimony as to how Sabal's easement would diminish the value of the property. Sabal moved for a new trial arguing the property owner's testimony was based purely on speculation. The Eleventh Circuit ruled against Sabal finding that the property owner's testimony was not based on speculation because she had experience selling similar parcels.
View More
|
Fourth DCA Rules That a Property Owner's Intent to Live on Their Property is Not Enough to Demonstrate That the Property is the Owner's "Residence"
Broward County ("County") created a program by way of an interlocal agreement ("ILA") whereby specified property owners could claim a reduction in the appraisal market value of their property. The program was limited to those property owners who purchased their "residence" prior to the ILA's effective date. The property owner in this case purchased his parcel prior to the effective date, but the structure on the parcel was not complete until after the ILA's effective date. When the property owner applied to be part of the program, the County rejected his application. The Fourth District Court of Appeal engaged in a textualist analysis of the ILA and found that the property owner had not purchased a "residence" prior to the ILA's effective date.
View More
|
Middle District of Florida Rules That a Citizen Must Exhaust His or Her State Level Appeals of a Local Government Decision Before Bringing a Procedural Due Process Claim in Federal Court
The City of Clewiston ("City") cited Clewiston Commons for not complying with the zoning designation of a parcel it owned, and a special magistrate ordered the structures on the parcel removed. The citation and removal order came after nearly a decade of the City granting permits that allowed Clewiston Commons' operation. Clewiston Commons appealed the special magistrate's order in state court and sued the City in federal court alleging it violated Clewiston Commons' right to procedural due process. The federal district court held that Clewiston Commons had not been denied procedural due process because of the availability of state law remedies.
View More
|
Middle District of Florida Rules That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Imminent and Substantial Danger in Order to Succeed Under a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Claim
Property owners brought suit in federal court against the City of Fort Myers ("the City") under the Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA), as well as under several state laws. The City of Fort Myers dumped toxic sludge onto the land in the 1960's and failed to clean up the toxic waste until 2019 when the sludge was completely removed. The Court held in favor of the City, reasoning that the RCRA required the Court to look at the imminent & substantial endangerment in the present or near future-and finding that there was none in the groundwater, soil, or by the spread of toxic dust.
View More
|
First DCA Holds That Restrictive Covenants in a Private Easement Agreement are Not Compensable as a Taking
Owner of an easement granting rights to advertise via a billboard near Highway 98 sued the Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT") for inverse condemnation. The FDOT planned to create a flyover which involved elevating the highway by twenty feet, thus blocking the view of the plaintiff's billboard. The plaintiff argued that (1) the FDOT was required to pay for the loss of visibility, and (2) the FDOT was required to pay for the loss of access to the property. The trial court granted the FDOT's motion for summary judgment. The appellate court affirmed, noting the loss of visibility was not compensable under Florida law and that there was no loss of access to the property.
View More
|
Second DCA Holds That Florida Department of Agriculture Was Required to Pay a $14 Million Judgment Against the Department Due to a 2003 Taking
In 2014, homeowners were awarded over $14 million resulting from an inverse condemnation claim when the Department of Agriculture removed 33,957 healthy trees in order to eliminate citrus canker. After the Department failed to pay, the court issued a writ of mandamus in 2018 ordering the Department to pay immediately. On appeal, the court affirmed the lower court's decision, agreeing with the lower court's reasoning that any further delay of the constitutionally-guaranteed full compensation would be unacceptable.
View More
|
TEAM MEMBER SPOTLIGHT
|
Michael P. Paparesta, Ph.D.*
Director of Valuation Research
|
Michael's Practice:
Michael serves as the Firm's in-house real estate analyst. He has over 18 years of experience in ad valorem taxation with a background in commercial and residential real property valuation, property tax appeals, real property tax administration, and property tax policy. Michael provides the Firm with the capability to conduct in-depth research and analysis to support tax assessment challenges. He provides unique insight on how to address and resolve an assortment of ad valorem taxation issues.
|
|
Background:
Prior to joining the Firm, Michael worked in the Miami-Dade County Office of the Property Appraiser as a Real Estate Evaluator and an Income Evaluation Specialist amongst multiple divisions. Over the span of 16 years, Michael gained expertise and knowledge relating to commercial real estate market analysis, building cost analysis, agricultural classification hearings, substantial completion hearings and value adjustment board hearings. Michael received his Ph.D. from Florida International University with a concentration in Public Affairs. His dissertation was entitled, "Understanding the Impact of Property Tax Appeals on Assessment Uniformity: Procedures, Structures, and Outcomes."
|
|
|
QUALIFIED OPPORTUNITY ZONES
|
EXECUTIVE ORDER PERMIT EXTENSION TRACKER
|
RECENT NEWS
|
|
|
MEET THE TEAM
|
*Abbye Feeley, Ken Metcalf, Michael Paparesta, Marco Paredes, Chris Smith, and David Smith are not attorneys and are not authorized to practice law.
Abbye, Ken, and David are highly experienced planners. Ken is AICP certified.
Chris is a highly experienced GIS analyst.
Michael is a highly experienced real estate analyst.
Marco is a highly experienced government affairs professional.
|
Special thanks to Christopher Berg, Nicole Neugebauer, and Nicholas Marler who assisted in the drafting of this edition. Christopher is a third year Juris Doctor Candidate at the Florida State University College of Law. Nicole is a third-year Juris Doctor Candidate at Stetson University College of Law. Nicholas is a second-year Juris Doctor Candidate at Stetson University College of Law.
|
|
|
|
|