Vol. 28, No. 2, February 2024

Delaware Developments

by Benjamin K. Durstein, Esq.


Delaware Superior Court affirms an Industrial Accident Board decision that a claimant injured while performing an employer-related volunteer activity was not within the course and scope of employment.

Testa-Carr v. Sallie Mae, N23A-04-004 CEB (Del. Super. Feb. 8, 2024). Read More

Florida Developments

by Linda Wagner Farrell, Esq.


Judges of compensation claims have the authority to take a flexible and holistic approach to permanent total disability claims as the triers of fact. The Blake methods are guidelines, not requirements.

Gulf Management, Inc. and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc. v. Talmadge Wall, DCA#: 20-2037;

JCC: Massey; Decision date: Nov. 29, 2023 Read More

New Jersey Developments

by Kiara K. Hartwell, Esq.


Appellate Divisions affirms a workers’ compensation judge’s decision that the claimant’s testimony was not credible and his medical expert’s theory was not supported by objective evidence.

Donald Smith v. H&H Transportation, Inc., No. A-3568-21 (Dec. 20, 2023). Read More


Appellate Division confirms that the trial judge correctly applied the intentional-wrong exception to the insurer’s policy.

Dionicio Rodriguez v. Shelbourne Spring, LLC, et al. and Sir Electric, LLC v. Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co., No. A-2079-22 (Dec. 22, 2023). Read More

Pennsylvania Developments

by Francis X. Wickersham, Esq.


Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board did not err in granting employer’s petition for a de novo hearing to present after-discovered evidence of a medical provider’s prohibited self-referral to a pharmacy that a workers’ compensation judge would not allow.

Bernice Bennett v. Jeld Wen, Inc. (WCAB); No. 1454 C.D. 2022; filed Oct. 6, 2023; President Judge Cohn Jubelirer (previously unreported and designated reported by Order dated Dec. 15, 2023). Read More


Although claimant cannot be working with a concurrent employer on date of work injury with another employer, the relationship with the concurrent employer was sufficiently intact that concurrent wages must be included in calculating average weekly wage.

Resources for Human Development, Inc. and Gallagher Bassett Services v. Sherry Dixon (WCAB); No. 494 C.D. 2022; filed Dec. 20, 2023; President Judge Cohn Jubelirer. Read More


Bureau directed to identify and publish in Pennsylvania Bulletin a different, nationally recognized schedule for valuing pharmaceuticals.

Federated Insurance Company v. Summit Pharmacy (Bureau of Workers’ Compensation Fee Review Hearing Office); No. 115 C.D. 2023; filed Jan. 2, 2024; President Judge Cohn Jubelirer. Read More

UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 

It has become increasingly apparent that there is a cross-over between workers’ compensation and unemployment cases. While the two areas of law are mutually exclusive by way of collateral estoppel, it is clear the same issues are simultaneously being litigated in both forums. By using the unemployment and workers’ compensation forums to bolster defenses in both claims, we achieve successful results for our clients. Our unemployment practice is full service, with our attorneys handling claims at all levels of the courts. We welcome the opportunity to work with you in defending your unemployment compensation matters.


For more information, please contact:


Delaware: Linda L. Wilson, Esquire

(302) 552-4327 | llwilson@mdwcg.com


Florida: Heather Byrer Carbone, Esquire

(904) 358-4225 | hbcarbone@mdwcg.com


New Jersey: Robert J. Fitzgerald, Esquire

(856) 414-6009 | rjfitzgerald@mdwcg.com


Pennsylvania: Anthony Natale III, Esquire

(215) 575-2745 | apnatale@mdwcg.com

Click here for News and Litigation Results


Should you have additional inquiries, please contact:

Michele R. Punturi, Esq.

Director, Workers' Compensation Department

 

2000 Market Street, Suite 2300

Philadelphia, PA 19103

 

Marshall Dennehey

marshalldennehey.com

CONTACT US

X  LinkedIn

What's Hot in Workers' Comp, Vol. 28, No. 2, February 2024, is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. We would be pleased to provide such legal assistance as you require on these and other subjects when called upon. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1 Copyright © 2024 Marshall Dennehey, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm. For reprints or inquiries, or if you wish to be removed from this mailing list, contact tamontemuro@mdwcg.com.

View as Webpage