|
|
Structure & Site
Summer 2023
|
|
PROJECT SPOTLIGHT: Parrott Hall
|
|
Parrott Hall is a historic three-story wood-framed structure with perimeter brick walls and an ornate wrought-iron perimeter verandah. Formerly known as the Denton House, the building was built in 1852 and has been vacant since the 1970's.
Currently under the ownership of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, Parrott Hall is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
|
|
In 2018 KHH conducted a structural condition review of the building, in conjunction with Crawford & Stearns Architects and Preservation Planners. Long-term roof leakage had caused severe deterioration to portions of the roof, third-floor framing, and the upper portions of the south wall. After a series of emergency shoring and temporary roof tarping campaigns, a plan was developed to reconstruct the severely damaged roof and exterior wall elements. Construction of this initial phase was completed in 2022. Currently we are finalizing design work for the second phase which includes replacement of the failed portions of the interior floors as well as parts of the verandah structure.
The intent of the project is to maintain the integrity of the exterior envelope and structure in order to create a space that honors the architectural, agricultural, and scientific history of the building.
For the full project profile visit our website here.
|
|
Prime Soils Can Benefit From Community Solar
|
|
Soil is the lifeblood of agriculture. It is a precious natural resource much like freshwater. Both are necessary for the growth of crops we consume and for a balanced ecosystem. Among the many things that differentiate these two resources are their lifecycles. The natural life cycle of freshwater occurs frequently on more of an annual or biannual timeframe. Topsoil, in its natural state, takes much longer to be established and involves many forces of nature to reach its peak condition. This brings up an often debated question about the relationship between solar arrays and the soil of agricultural lands: is it a matter of conservation or preservation?
One aspect of soil conservation is the careful use and management of a resource that could ultimately be depleted. An example is a farmer planting a cover crop or utilizing “no-till” planting techniques to maximize soil retention in the fields. Preservation on the other hand strives to retain the soil as it is, keeping it protected from effects like continual nutrient depletion due to harvesting. In this article we will discuss ways in which solar arrays can actually help contribute toward preserving topsoil for future agricultural use.
Soil preservation through community solar array development can be achieved in ways that may not be so obvious to us. There are three general considerations to be reviewed when planners and/or environmentalists among us are confronted with land use and development pertaining to solar farms.
They include:
1. The ability for the topsoil of an agricultural field to rest and be rejuvenated over the life of a solar farm is valuable as a restorative effect.
Typical modern-day agriculture practices often result in the depletion of soil nutrients. Practices such as cash crops have become a demanding type of farming (i.e., corn and soy). Solar array projects can help re-establish nutrients that have been depleted from our precious agricultural soils. Instead of the land being slowly exhausted of essential nutrients, soil structure, and vegetation, the soil is better positioned to relax and replenish over the serviceable life of a large-scale solar array (about 25 - 30 years).
The establishment of meadowlike vegetative cover beneath large solar array systems positively impacts the performance of the land. The thick, lush vegetative growth of meadow grasses and plants helps slow down stormwater runoff and thus increases the amount of rainwater absorption into the ground. It also minimizes and can eliminate sediment transport by means of erosion control protection, which is essential to maintain the topsoil structure of the fields.
2. Allowing the area occupied by the solar array to become a habitat for wildlife to thrive, supplying food and cover that would otherwise be absent for most of the year with cash crop harvesting.
With proper planting mixes the maintenance of vegetation can help to protect the integrity of the soil. The upkeep of the plantings can be minimized to one required cutting each year in early spring and the cuttings can be left to work back into the ground and allow for the renourishment of the soil. Left to grow throughout the rest of the year, the vegetated understory of the solar array serves as nesting grounds, food sources, and cover for wildlife at critical points in nature’s annual lifecycle. Providing flowers for pollinators and other insects is crucial to a healthy natural environment. The fruits and seeds of the meadow provide a source of valuable food to all forms of wildlife - birds, reptiles, insects, and mammals alike. And while the composition of heavy vegetation offers cover for rearing up young creatures, animals of prey such as foxes and hawks ultimately benefit from a bountiful source of small mammals and birds.
3. Income generated by landowners of solar arrays preserves rich soil for future farmers.
We are a steward of the land in the natural ecosystem. Relaxing the soil and regenerating it with nutrients improves conditions for the future operations of farmers to come. A farmer who owns a large tract of land is often up against hardship. This includes potential loss of land due to tax burdens or the unpredictability of weather and crop yield. In many cases, a landowner is susceptible to selling the farm against their will which often results in non-agricultural development. When a farmer can utilize a portion of their land to generate needed income from a consistent source like the sun, they benefit in not only saving the family farm but enriching the land for future farming of the soils within the footprint of the solar array.
Solar arrays don’t just preserve family legacies, they preserve the land they are built on. The soil has time to replenish, wildlife can prosper in a naturalistic habitat, and landowners can bank the land for future agricultural investment. A solar array project is not a permanent fixture on a community’s landscape. In a “long-term” but temporary use arrangement, the arrays only borrow the space they are built on, giving back the land and the preserved enhanced soil to the landowner after a set amount of time. The soil is relaxed, replenished, and ripe for farming by future generations of the community.
|
|
KHH Employee Milestone Anniversaries
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Natalya Medvedev
30 years
Retired in May of 2023
|
|
 |
|
We are also excited to celebrate the following employee anniversaries:
|
|
Jim D'Aloisio, 36 years
Cindy MacConnell, 28 years
Michelle Borton, 7 years
Steve Darcangelo, 1 year
|
|
Jim Palumbo, 28 years
Leslie Terry, 7 years
Alan Greer, 4 years, with prior internship
Michelle Kivisto, 1 year
|
|
|
What’s Your Foundation Insulation Situation?
|
By Jim D'Aloisio P.E., LEED AP
Foundation and slab edge insulation is the true “corner of the envelope.” It’s one of the least understood, and frequently one of the least well-detailed, parts of the thermal barrier. Yet the Energy Code conveys clear requirements, and it can be a source of building energy loss and interior occupant discomfort (e.g., cold feet!) if not handled properly.
The E-Code codifies the thermal properties of slab-on-grade edge insulation as either a minimum insulation R-value or a maximum assembly F-Factor for prescriptive code compliance paths. An F-factor is similar to a U-factor, except the unit is Btu per linear foot of slab edge, as opposed to Btu per square foot. F-factors for various insulation configurations are listed in ASHRAE 90.1 Appendix A. Paradoxically, the most effective location for slab edge insulation, through the center of the foundation wall to align with the above-grade perimeter wall insulation, is not explicitly described in the code. Rather, the code allows two locations for the insulation: Exterior and interior.
Insulation along the exterior face of a foundation wall
The Energy Code prescriptive requirement of insulation is for a minimum of two feet down the face of the wall from the elevation of the top of the slab-on-grade. This is where the insulation will be most effective. However, by extending the insulation down to the top of the footing, which is typically how it’s installed, additional thermal losses are avoided, and the resulting F-factor is reduced. Exterior face insulation requires protection, primarily from UV radiation, on all portions of the exposed insulation and the area extending down six inches below grade. For building walls supporting exterior masonry, a useful variant is the use of a bottom course of insulative structural load-bearing material such as foam glass, to minimize thermal bridging losses at the top of the wall. Proprietary material that suits these requirements is readily available, is heat and chemical resistant, and has been successfully used in buildings for decades.
An interesting aspect of exterior face insulation is that it can be incorporated into a frost-protected shallow foundation system. Assuming proper attention is paid to site drainage and subgrade material, this approach results in the required depth of the foundation as roughly half that of a conventional footing that would need to be set below the local extreme frost line depth.
Insulation on the inside of a foundation wall, along the exterior edge of the slab
This variant is currently more common. There are two alternatives to this: Insulation that runs from the top of the slab down the inside face of the foundation wall, and insulation that runs along the exterior edge of the slab continuously with insulation that runs underneath the outer two feet or so of the slab. For higher thermal performance a combination of both schemes can be used. In both cases, the challenge is the top edge: If the insulation does not extend up to the top of the slab, it does not comply with the prescriptive E-code requirements. We and other engineering firms have relied on detailing a 45-degree top chamfer, so that the slab surface is continuous to the face of the wall, while most of the insulation value remains. Despite frequent concerns expressed about this detail, we have not seen it cause any constructability or durability problems. In any case, interior slab edge insulation frequently results in a small, code-allowed but distinct amount of continuous concrete thermal bridging between the slab edge insulation and the superstructure wall insulation.
Click here to find out the insulation material that must be used on New York commercial projects and what the Energy Code suggests for basement wall insulation.
For all of the above conditions, every building has foundation insulation detailing challenges. These include the conditions at door thresholds, exterior columns, and loading docks, to name a few. In addition, on some design teams, the architect shows all foundation insulation details, and on others the structural engineer takes the lead. Ideally, both sets of drawings convey the same insulation geometry. We consider it an opportunity to discuss and coordinate building details with the project architect, to achieve successful and code-compliant construction.
|
|
Greg Cotroneo, EIT, joins KHH with two years of full-time experience and four years of intern experience as a structural engineer. He graduated from Stony Brook University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering Sciences, specializing in Civil Engineering. In his free time Greg likes sailing, tinkering with computers, and enjoys skiing and snowboarding. He resides in Rome, NY with his fiancée.
|
|
|
|
Jim D'Aloisio was awarded the first David C. Ashley Green Building Advocate of the Year award, pictured on the left, at the 21st annual NYS Green Building Conference in March.
In December KHH employees gathered together with other firms in our building for a Holiday Feast featuring a gift exchange and an entire table devoted to desserts. It was followed in January with a spaghetti meal complete with homemade garlic bread for an office-wide luncheon, a hot cocoa bar on Valentine's Day, and a cookout on a sunny day in April.
The NY Statewide Preservation Conference, held at the Emerson Pavilion in Auburn, NY, was an enriching event attended by Jim Palumbo.
Jim D'Aloisio presented at the CSI Construction Outlook event in April, highlighting projects currently in progress or coming up for bid.
A celebration to commemorate the retirement of Natalya Medvedev was held at the end of May. KHH staff gathered to reflect on her career accomplishments and share stories about her time here at KHH.
|
|
Klepper, Hahn & Hyatt has signed on to SE 2050!
|
SE 2050 is an acronym for the Structural Engineers 2050 Commitment Program, designed to ensure substantive embodied carbon reductions in the design and construction of structural systems by the collective structural engineering profession. The term "embodied carbon” refers to the amount of carbon dioxide and other global warming gases emitted into the atmosphere by the extraction, processing, and use of a material or system.
The SE 2050 Commitment Program got its start from structural engineers who recognized a need to get involved in sustainability. The program is only two years old but already more than 100 firms across North America have signed on and submitted an Embodied Carbon Action Plan, or ECAP. Based on the work of the Carbon Leadership Forum, it has been endorsed by ASCE’s Structural Engineering Institute.
What does that mean for KHH? We have submitted an ECAP outlining our commitment to “understanding, reducing, and ultimately eliminating embodied carbon in our structural projects by the year 2050” through education, advocacy, reporting, and carbon reduction. Education starts from within, and we are launching an education program for our staff to share knowledge about embodied carbon that is emitted from structural materials and systems. Advocacy includes SE 2050 information uploaded to our newsletter and website. Reporting is developing and submitting calculations of the embodied carbon of structural materials from select projects to be included in the SE 2050 database. Reduction of carbon occurs when we select materials and systems for our projects that have lower than industry-average embodied carbon. An example of this is specifying the use of supplementary cementitious materials, such as fly ash or slag, in our projects’ concrete mixes. Of course, we will always make sure that our decisions do not negatively impact the structural performance, durability, or budget considerations of our clients’ projects.
For more information on SE 2050, including a list of signatory firms, click here.
|
|
More time-lapse videos of the construction progress at UHS Wilson Medical Center have been added to our social media sites! The project, located in Johnson City, NY, also recently celebrated a top beam ceremony in April for the completion of the structural steel framing of the building.
Click here to see pictures of the top beam placement and check out our other posts on the latest construction progress for the six-story tower!
Like and follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn by clicking on the blue circles below to see more project highlights and company news.
|
|
Klepper, Hahn & Hyatt is seeking professionals for positions in our firm. Talent, experience, and enthusiasm can lead to significant growth potential. We are a modest-sized, multidisciplinary design firm with a friendly, collaborative work environment, and offer an excellent benefits package. For more information on our open positions, please visit us at https://khhpc.com/contact-us/careers/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|