|
In this conversation with Rare President Caleb McClennen, Ph.D., Lizzie argues for place-based models, shows how tracking reveals full-lifecycle insights, and explains how focus can amplify impact.
Caleb: Given the state of the natural world for shorebird populations in particular, the challenge to “scale solutions” has never been more urgent. How does Manomet take on this challenge?
Lizzie: While I agree that there are urgent needs to heal the natural world, I guess I would use the phrase adapting models rather than scaling solutions. “Scaling solutions” suggests that “we” (who is we?) have the answers and can use a cookie-cutter mold for conservation on a grander scale. That is not the case. Each situation and place are different.
There are things we learn in one place that give us deep insight that may be relevant elsewhere. It’s where we see change first and understand it most clearly, and it provides us with long-term insights into a place and the species. Importantly, bird banding now, depending on the technology we are using, can provide us with information across the full lifecycle and migration journey of the species, rather than in just one place. New technology accelerates our knowledge, enabling us to be remote and hands-on scientists.
We are currently using these data to build demographic models for eight species of shorebirds, modeled after our success with recovering the American Oystercatcher population. To do so, we are weaving together the migratory pathways of these birds to understand where there is mortality or where they are facing threats. This will, in turn, inform where we need to apply conservation efforts.
And yes, this work is urgent, as our focal species have declined by 50 to 90% in the past 50 years.
|