|
Reproductive Healthcare Updates:
On Wednesday, January 14th, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) held a hearing to discuss medical abortions. While these hearings can be largely performative in nature, what this hearing showcased was the dangerous continuation of spreading misinformation about Mifepristone (one of the medications used in medical abortions). While we cannot directly influence these hearings, or what others do and say, we can educate ourselves and those around us to combat this misinformation. Study after study shows that Mifepristone is safe when used as directed. For more detailed stats, click HERE to see the statement from the Reproductive Healthcare Center. We have to be a part of countering the rampant misinformation being spread about many issues, not just reproductive healthcare.
Immigration:
The Department of Homeland Security is cleared to rework its federal immigration-status database, the decades-old SAVE system, for mass voter "verification" under a settlement with Florida, Ohio, Iowa, and Indiana. Created initially to confirm eligibility for public benefits, the system will now perform automated checks of U.S. citizenship, allowing all state DMVs to submit large batches of driver's license records for review.
This dangerous overhaul opens the door to wrongful voter purges, bulk data-sharing, and the potential misuse of personal information for immigration enforcement. These changes could remain in place for at least two decades, creating new barriers for communities that already face obstacles to the ballot box, including Black and Brown voters, naturalized citizens, and women who have changed their names.
To learn more, click HERE.
Healthcare Updates:
From the Kaiser Family Foundation: "On December 18, 2025, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued two proposed rules that would further limit youth access to gender affirming care. One rule would change the hospital Conditions of Participation (CoPs) which would prohibit most Medicare and Medicaid enrolled hospitals from providing specified gender affirming medical care for youth (the proposed CoPs rule). The second proposed rule would prohibit federal Medicaid or CHIP funds from covering this care for youth (the proposed Medicaid rule). Despite gender affirming care being considered a best practice model of care and consisting of interventions recommended by major medical associations, if finalized and implemented, the proposed rules would have a sweeping impact, albeit for a small number of young people, significantly limiting their access to these services."
To learn more, click HERE.
Time and time again, we have seen the benefit of proactive healthcare on long term outcomes. These services don't only benefit the individual, they benefit the healthcare system at large. Early intervention can decrease the level of services needed - and from an economic lens, those who are receiving support through public insurance - save an already over-extended system money. Unfortunately, the new Medicaid eligibility restrictions may lead millions of people to lose coverage and then miss potentially lifesaving cancer screenings like colonoscopies or mammograms. A new analysis estimates that Americans may miss more than a million cancer screenings for colorectal, breast, or lung cancer over the two years after the new policy takes effect.
To learn more, click HERE.
Bills we are watching:
*NEW*
Small Necessities Leave Act (State) This bill would create 24 hours of paid time off in a 1 year period for employees that do not currently have access to paid leave. More information below, link to co-sponsorship memo HERE.
Vote16PA has a co-sponsorship memo! More details below, link HERE.
*PREVIOUS*
Freedom Of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act (HB670) (State)- This bill would prohibit intimidation, obstruction, or violence in front of clinics.
Removing the Waiting Period and Counselling requirements for abortion services (HB2005) (State)- This Bill would remove the 24 hour waiting period and mandated counselling requirements prior to access an abortion.
HB 1315: Reforming Name Change Procedures/SB 521: Removing Publication Requirements for Name Changes (State)- This bill would remove antiquated requirements to publish the former and updated name.
SB 50: Protecting Insurance Coverage for Individuals with Pre-Existing Conditions (State)- This bill would protect Pennsylvanians if the Affordable Care Act gets repealed or deregulated.
Paid Family Leave / Family Care Act (State) - The House bill (HB200) is waiting for a vote on the floor and the Senate (SB906) bill has just been introduced and referred to the Labor and Industry Committee. For more information on paid family leave, click HERE.
Court Cases we are watching:
South Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J. (federal) The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in the above cases regarding state laws that ban transgender students from participating in sports that align with their gender identity. While in any case, oral arguments are not a determination on how the court will rule, based on questions and comments there is concern that the ruling will not be in favor of gender rights. If the court rules against them, states will continue to be allowed to ban transgender students from participation in sports in a way that aligns with their gender identity. More information on these cases HERE.
South Side Area School District v. Office of the Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (state) This case is about gender equity through the potential protections based on gender identity. For more information, click HERE.
Allegheny v PA DHS (State)- This court case challenges the ban on abortion services being funded by Medicaid in the PA Commonwealth. While a ruling was set for June, oral arguments were held on November 5th. We are awaiting the ruling in this case, which could come at any time. This case could have a profound impact on access to abortion for patients on Medicaid.
Louisiana v. Callais (Federal) This case could potentially invalidate part of the Voting Rights Act, specifically regarding racially based representation. For more information, click HERE.
|