Oct. 22, 2026

Top stories

■ White House takes new swipes at press, blocking a reporter and threatening an outlet (Washington Post) / ‘Andrew Feinberg, the reporter that Trump snapped at, was slated to serve as the print pool reporter on Thursday. Feinberg confirms to me that, without explanation, the White House told him today that he would no longer be the print pooler on Trump's Thursday trip.’ (Max Tani) / White House Correspondents’ Association accuses Trump admin of 'retaliation' after clash with reporter (TheWrap) / Trump won’t let me fly with him today — but he can’t silence me (The Independent) 


■ POLITICO fires back at White House threats, corrects Susie Wiles story (TheWrap) / POLITICO corrects story on Susie Wiles after White House threatens ‘consequences’ (The Hill) 


■ Judge orders Trump to sit for a deposition in his defamation lawsuit against the BBC by Dec. 11 (Associated Press)


■ With Trump polling at new lows, FCC chair issues warning about ‘fake polls’ (CNN) / Polling company goes dark as investigative report suggests they're yet another fake (Mediaite) / More pollster funny business uncovered by FiftyPlusOne (FiftyPlusOne) 


■ ‘CBS' owned stations will carry DraftKings branding through Election Night, a sponsorship that has stirred concern inside the company.’ (Status) 


■ Student journalists were talking to UMD athletes. Then police showed up. (The Banner) 


■ Why a pillar of Christian journalism is in turmoil (New York Times) 


■ BBC merges TV and audio commissioning teams amid plan to cut 100 content roles (Deadline)


■ NPR and University of Maryland partner to host public editor at the Philip Merrill College of Journalism (NPR) / The New York Times hires two new reporters on Tech team (New York Times) / Bianna Golodryga leaving CNN for 'new opportunity' (TheWrap) / Bloomberg hires Khan to cover Middle East oil (Talking Biz News) / Dow Jones Energy hires Wang as reporter (Talking Biz News) / Sarah Koenig launches 'Metro' podcast, her first since 'Serial' premiered 12 years ago (TheWrap)


■ When hackers become sources: Inside the new craft of reporting on hacked data (Nieman Journalism Lab)


■ 'Seized' spins tale of small-town newspaper raid, First Amendment fight (Deadline)

 
CRAFT

Following the money in the final stretch of the midterms


By Holly Butcher Grant, NPCJI Community Manager


Dark money, super PACs, donation thresholds, contribution limits: campaign finance can look like a wall of jargon standing between reporters and a good election story. Earlier this year, the Institute hosted Brendan Glavin, director of insights at OpenSecrets, to break down the terminology and rules behind lobbying and campaign donations.


With the midterms just weeks away, his guidance is worth revisiting as you track where the money is flowing in local and federal races.


Start with the limits, because they may vary more than reporters might expect. In federal races, an individual can give a candidate $3,500 per election, or $7,000 per cycle across the primary and general (FEC). State limits are a different story. Some states cap contributions tightly, while others set no limits at all. Disclosure thresholds work the same way and determine what data you can actually see.


Federally, donors who give more than $200 in aggregate must be reported with their name, address, occupation and employer. At the state level, the most common threshold is around $100, though some states have none. Donations below the threshold are often reported as a single lump sum of “unitemized” contributions, so a gap in the data doesn’t necessarily signal wrongdoing. It may simply mean a donor or candidate hasn’t crossed a reporting threshold.


It also pays to know the players beyond individual donors.


  • Candidates and campaigns raise and spend for their own races within limits, and political parties file their own reports detailing donors and expenses.
  • Traditional PACs can give directly to candidates but face contribution limits.
  • Super PACs can’t give to candidates or coordinate with them, but they can raise unlimited sums, which makes them a favorite vehicle for very wealthy donors.
  • Dark money groups, often 501(c)(4) nonprofits or LLCs, can spend on elections without disclosing donors. This is increasingly becoming a local issue where voters may see highly influential ads without knowing who paid for them.
  • Corporations and unions are barred from contributing directly to federal candidates, though they can give to super PACs, and, once again, state laws will differ. “Be aware of the jurisdiction that you’re writing about,” Glavin said.


For your own reporting, Glavin pointed to OpenSecrets and its federal lobbying data, FollowTheMoney.org for state-level contributions, and the FEC for federal filings. You can watch the full webinar here:

CAREER
 

Leadership Tip: Giving constructive feedback


“Many leaders believe candid negative feedback improves performance, but when criticism feels belittling or humiliating, it often produces the opposite effect. Research drawing on employees’ firsthand accounts shows that destructive criticism—especially when it attacks character, lacks guidance, or occurs publicly—undermines confidence, suppresses learning and innovation, and drives disengagement and turnover. Leaders can prevent these outcomes by setting clear guardrails for feedback, focusing criticism on specific behaviors and next steps, and repairing trust quickly when feedback causes harm.”


-- Excerpt from “When feedback crosses the line” (Harvard Business Review)

 
 
COMMUNITY

Resources


This newsletter is written and edited by the National Press Club Journalism Institute staff. Send us your questions and suggestions for topics to cover.


Get this from a friend? Subscribe and view the archives.

Bluesky  Instagram  Facebook  Linkedin  X  Youtube

DONATE TO THE INSTITUTE


The National Press Club Journalism Institute promotes First Amendment values by equipping journalists in Washington, D.C., and nationwide with the skills, knowledge, standards, resources and networks to empower and inform the public. As the non-profit affiliate of the National Press Club, the Institute powers journalism in the public interest. The Institute's tax ID number is 52-1750908.