Monday Evening, May 15, 2023
MRFF DEMANDS AIR FORCE GATE GUARDS
AT JOINT BASE ANDREWS IMMEDIATELY
CEASE THEIR “HAVE A BLESSED DAY”
CODED CHRISTIAN SALUTATION


"… I feel like it's not a sincere wish that my day be "blessed," but instead it is a way of signaling to me that they are a Christian.

Are they testing me? I wonder if this phrase is something
like a secret-handshake. I also wonder what the
"correct" response would be from someone who wanted
to signal-back that they too were a Christian. ...

... I suppose that saying "have-a-blessed-day" (4 words)
gets the point across much more succinctly than
"have-a-nice-day-and-by-the-way-I'm-a-Christian-are-you-one-too-and-if-you're-not-I'm-a-better-person-than-you" (25 words)."

— Poster on Democratic Underground
Joint Base Andrews sign with photoshopped neon sign letters saying have a blessed day
Neon "HAVE A BLESSED DAY" Photoshopped, but might as well really be there
MRFF Matters – 5/15/23 – "Have a Blessed Day"
is NOT OK Andrews AFB Gate Guards!
MRFF OP-ED
ON DAILY KOS

#1 Trending story on Daily Kos

They’re driving onto a military base,
not visiting a religious retreat!

By: MRFF Senior Research Director Chris Rodda

Monday, May 15, 2023
Chris Rodda
The word “blessed,” defined as being “endowed with divine favor and protection,” has no place coming out of the mouths of military base gate guards as they admit service members, civilian employees, and visitors onto their base. But recently at Joint Base Andrews, well-known as the home of Air Force One, several gate guards — armed, uniformed airmen — have adopted “Have a blessed day” as their salutation to personnel passing through the gate — wishing base personnel “divine favor and protection” whether they want it or not. And many absolutely do NOT want it, fifteen of whom, eight of them Christians, have come to the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) to get this religious greeting committee to knock it off.

The greeting “Have a blessed day” is commonplace in the South. It is also distinctly Christian. People of no other religion use it. In fact, it is seen by many, like the poster who wrote the following on Democratic Underground, as code for “I’m a Christian.”

What Does It Mean When Someone Says To Me "Have A Blessed Day"??

… For some reason, that phrase strikes me as being a bit pretentious. I feel like it's not a sincere wish that my day be "blessed," but instead it is a way of signaling to me that they are a Christian.

Are they testing me? I wonder if this phrase is something like a secret-handshake. I also wonder what the "correct" response would be from someone who wanted to signal-back that they too were a Christian.

Are they just assuming that I'm a Christian? If they knew I was an atheist, would they STILL want me to have a blessed day?

Would this be considered "flaunting" their Christianity? I suppose that saying "have-a-blessed-day" (4 words) gets the point across much more succinctly than "have-a-nice-day-and-by-the-way-I'm-a-Christian-are-you-one-too-and-if-you're-not-I'm-a-better-person-than-you" (25 words).
Responding to the above post, another poster wrote:

I don't know about everywhere

But in eastern KY saying "Have a blessed day" IS, in fact, some creepy Christian code. Seriously.
There are posts on websites such as askamanager.org, which fields questions about workplace issues, answering questions like:

Is it appropriate to end your professional voice mail greeting with the phrase “Have a blessed day”? I find it jarring to encounter in the context of work as a non-Christian.
To which the answer was:

I find it mildly jarring too (also as a non-Christian), although it’s a really, really common thing to say/hear in the south … so common that a lot of people would be surprised to hear that anyone takes issue with it (which is a problem and reflects the privilege of the dominant faith to not even be aware that some of its words and trappings aren’t secular).

Outside of work, it’s easier to simply take the phrase as a general expression of well wishes. At work though, the bar is higher; people should keep religious statements — even mild ones — out of work communications (including their outgoing voicemail messages). You’re going to have an uphill battle arguing that among most of its adherents though.
MRFF has fought this “uphill battle” before, in 2015, after receiving complaints from Robins Air Force Base in Georgia, where the gate guards had also adopted the “Have a blessed day” greeting. While initially being successful in getting the base to instruct its gate guards not to use the phrase, that decision was unfortunately later reversed by the Air Force, leaving the gate guards free to use their I’m-a-Christian code phrase.

While it’s understandable that this is an uphill battle in the civilian world, it should absolutely not be an uphill battle in the military, where regulations such as Air Force Instruction 1-1, section 2.12 of which clearly states (emphasis added):

“Leaders at all levels must balance constitutional protections for their own free exercise of religion, including individual expressions of religious beliefs, and the constitutional prohibition against governmental establishment of religion. They must ensure their words and actions cannot reasonably be construed to be officially endorsing or disapproving of, or extending preferential treatment for any faith, belief, or absence of belief.”
It was also decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in Parker v. Levy that members of the military do not have the same unrestricted right to freedom of speech as those in the civilian world. From the majority opinion, authored by ultra-conservative Justice William Rehnquist (emphasis added):

“This Court has long recognized that the military is, by necessity, a specialized society separate from civilian society... While the members of the military are not excluded from the protection granted by the First Amendment, the different character of the military community and of the military mission requires a different application of those protections. The fundamental necessity for obedience, and the consequent necessity for imposition of discipline, may render permissible within the military that which would be constitutionally impermissible outside it ... Speech that is protected in the civil population may nonetheless undermine the effectiveness of response to command. If it does, it is constitutionally unprotected.” 417 U.S.733 (1974)
It should be a no-brainer that gate guards at a U.S. military base can’t greet people by essentially saying, “I’m a Christian. Are you?”

And yet MRFF is now fighting the battle against this religious greeting, described around the web as “jarring” and “creepy” by non-Christians, at the high-profile Joint Base Andrews, with MRFF founder and president Mikey Weinstein writing the following to Vice Wing Commander of the 316th Wing at Joint Base Andrews-Naval Air Facility Washington, Colonel Parkin C. Bryson:

From: Michael L Weinstein <mikeyw4444@icloud.com>
Subject: U.S. Constitutional and USAF Regulatory Violations at Joint Base Andrews Under Your Direct Command
Date: May 12, 2023 at 7:56:12 AM MDT
To: Colonel Parkin C. Bryson
Cc: Colonel Todd E. Randolph, Air Force Chief of Staff Charles Q. Brown Jr., Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall

...Col. Bryson, as per our just completed telecon…..the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) is representing 15 individual USAF airman complainants at Joint Base Andrews under your direct command as their 316th Vice Wing Commander in this unfortunate matter….the illicit actions of your Security Forces gate guards, whom are all armed and in their USAF uniforms and clearly on duty MUST be stopped immediately!!….their statements are an absolutely CLEAR violation of, inter alia, Air Force Instruction (AFI) 1-1, Section 2.12!!

…(please see below)…

…these USAF Security Forces personnel are dishonorably destroying good order, morale, discipline and unit cohesion by making these clearly sectarian Christian statements to personnel entering onto Joint Base Andrews through the entry gates….no other faith nor non-faith traditions say this obviously sectarian phrase…..of MRFF’s 15 USAF clients here under your and Col Randolph’s command, 8 are actually Christians themselves, both Protestant and Roman Catholic….the others are Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Atheist and Agnostic….

…..none of them felt that they could register this grievances here to their chains of command nor file an IG and/or EEO complaint without facing the very real prospects of insidious reprisal, retribution revenge and retaliation…..none of which speaks well about your current command climate there…

……please advise ASAP as to the action you will be taking here to immediately cease and deist from further violations of the Constitution’s separation of church and state mandates in the First Amendment, as well as in Clause 3 of Article 6 (“No Religious Test”), germane, construing, Constitutional, Federal caselaw, all of the Directives, Instructions and Regulations at DoD and the USAF as well as the mandates of UCMJ and particularly the Core Values of the USAF; "Integrity First, Service Before Self, and Excellence In All We Do"

….thank you, Colonel…..MRFF eagerly awaits your and the 316th Wing Commander's (Col. Randolph’s) expeditious action here to justly eradicate this abhorrent, unconstitutional, Christian proselytizing activity currently being undertaken by your armed USAF Security Forces gate guards under your direct command at Joint Base Andrews …

Michael L. “Mikey” Weinstein, Esq.
Founder and President
Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF)
505-250-7727


From: (Active Duty USAF Officer’s E-mail Address Withheld)
Subject: Have a Blessed Day by SF AD Gate Guards
Date: May 12, 2023 at 6:31:55 AM MDT

Mikey, I’m an Active Duty Air Force Officer stationed at JB Andrews, MD. I’m writing to and seeking MRFF assistance in ensuring the 316th Security Forces Base Defenders comply with AFI 1-1 and stop greeting drivers with “have a blessed day” as their IDs are checked. 

Probably about 10% of the time going through the various gates at Andrews several Active Duty Guards who are armed and in uniform will greet those coming through the gate with “have a blessed day.” This statement is clearly meant as a Christian overture toward Jesus blessing those driving onto JB Andrews. I’ve noticed several different Airman who will say this, so it is not just one SF (Security Forces) Airman who is failing in their duty to comply with AFI 1-1. 

Again, this is a violation of AFI 1-1 and they should immediately cease with this greeting. Should they continue to violate AFI 1-1, it will erode trust that is placed upon them to defend the base. If they can’t do the basics like comply with AFI 1-1, how can they be trusted in their core capacity? 

I’m reaching out to MRFF because I know that you will respond swiftly and restore our hope in our Airmen and restore integrity and patriotism to JB Andrews. (Active Duty USAF Officer’s name, rank, AFSC and unit all withheld)


Air Force Instruction (AFI) 1-1, Section 2.12 (emphasis added):

2.12. Balance of Free Exercise of Religion and Establishment Clause. Leaders at all levels must balance constitutional protections for their own free exercise of religion, including individual expressions of religious beliefs, and the constitutional prohibition against governmental establishment of religion. They must ensure their words and actions cannot reasonably be construed to be officially endorsing or disapproving of, or extending preferential treatment for any faith, belief, or absence of belief. 


Parker v. Levy:

An individual's right to free expression is not as absolute in the military as it is in the civilian world. The Supreme Court made this very clear in the 1974 case Parker v. Levy, when it said (emphasis added):

“This Court has long recognized that the military is, by necessity, a specialized society separate from civilian society... While the members of the military are not excluded from the protection granted by the First Amendment, the different character of the military community and of the military mission requires a different application of those protections. The fundamental necessity for obedience, and the consequent necessity for imposition of discipline, may render permissible within the military that which would be constitutionally impermissible outside it ... Speech that is protected in the civil population may nonetheless undermine the effectiveness of response to command. If it does, it is constitutionally unprotected.” 417 U.S.733 (1974)
If you can, please help MRFF continue to fight these battles on behalf of our service men and women who can’t fight back against the military’s Christian nationalists alone!
MRFF has fought this battle before at Robins Air Force Base in Georgia, and although initially being successful in getting the base to instruct its gate guards not to use the phrase, that decision was unfortunately later reversed by the Air Force.
SUPPORT MRFF's SOCIAL MEDIA

Please Help Increase
MRFF’s Social Media Engagement
Please Share on Social Media
PLEASE MAKE A
100% TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION

MRFF is a 501C3 Nonprofit
MRFF Information/Contact:
(505) 250-7727