July 23, 2025

Top stories

■ ‘Murdoch's WSJ is not backing down from Trump's libel suit — it just published another piece tying him to the Epstein files. But that doesn't mean Murdoch won't settle eventually.’ (Peter Kafka)


■ ‘In a meeting with NPR staff … leadership is sharing what it did to try and save federal funding. NPR is also telling staff that it is currently meeting with top donors, including an unnamed billionaire and wealthy donors on the West Coast.’ (Max Tani) / TPT lays off employees in wake of federal funding cut (Current) 


■ Patrick Soon-Shiong’s plan to take Los Angeles Times public follows Newsmax mini-IPO (The Wrap) / ‘It’s insulting’: Los Angeles Times owner stuns staff with plans to go public (POLITICO) / ‘Jon Stewart torched media executives for bowing to Trump — then handed Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong … an unchallenging interview minutes later.’ (Status) 


■ Things are somehow getting worse for The Washington Post (Vanity Fair) / How much longer can The Washington Post bleed talent? (Poynter)


■ Skydance tells FCC it will create CBS News ombudsman, eliminate DEI at Paramount (Hollywood Reporter)


■ Eighth Circuit preserves FCC’s local radio rules, but strikes down some TV limits (Inside Radio) 


■ Alden Global Capital makes a play for The Dallas Morning News (New York Times) 


■ Disney considers putting ad logos in streaming news tickers for ‘What You Need to Know’ (Variety) 


■ Family, advocacy groups call on ICE to free detained Atlanta reporter (Axios) 


■ Felony charges dismissed against CityBeat journalists arrested in Roebling Bridge protest (Cincinnati Enquirer)


■ AFP journalists warn their 'last reporters will die' working in current Gaza conditions (Associated Press) / Journalists are starving in Gaza (Columbia Journalism Review)


■ Edward Leon named CEO of PBS Fort Wayne (Current) / Karen Tumulty joins the Politics & Government desk as chief political correspondent (Washington Post) / Carla Broyles named deputy head of Print (Washington Post) / The New York Times names new deputy editor on Obituaries (New York Times) / Isabelle Khurshudyan joins CNN as senior enterprise reporter/writer (CNN) 


■ Google users are less likely to click on links when an AI summary appears in the results (Pew Research Center) / What news sources AI chat bots read (Axios) / To beat the AI squeeze, Newsweek is building revenue beyond traffic (Digiday) 


■ New podcast digs into journalist Austin Tice, who went missing in Syria (CBS News) 


■ How did newspapers in places like Harrisburg, Birmingham, and Syracuse become some of America’s most-read online? (Nieman Journalism Lab)

CRAFT

Explanatory journalism and the 'Big Beautiful Bill': Tips for localizing federal policy


By James McCurtis


President Trump’s massive spending and tax bill became law on July 4. At nearly 900 pages long, the “Big Beautiful Bill” will impact all Americans — especially those relying on Medicaid. 

To help journalists navigate this expansive bill, the Institute reached out to Julie Zauzmer Weil, who has been covering taxes at The Washington Post since 2013. She published an explainer earlier this month highlighting major effects the bill will have on Medicaid recipients, seniors, families, immigrants, and other Americans. 


We asked Weil to describe how she approaches explanatory journalism on complicated topics like this, and tips for covering sweeping federal policy and tax credits while making it digestible for local audiences.

This interview has been lightly edited for length and clarity. Click here to read the full interview.


How can journalists break complex topics like this bill down for a general audience?


Zauzmer Weil: It's all about explaining. It's everything that we do as journalists – to ask our sources, ask people in the world who are knowledgeable to explain. And then our job is to translate and break it down and explain for anybody who's our reader to understand it. 


So if you're writing about Medicaid, for instance, a huge number of Americans are on Medicaid. They're very familiar with exactly how it works. So that's part of your audience. 


And then there's another part of your audience who have never really had to think much about Medicaid until now. So when you write your story, make sure that you're conveying information that both sides would find valuable.


What advice do you have for journalists to make federal policy more accessible for local audiences?


Zauzmer Weil: It starts with talking to people in your community and seeing what they're worried about and what's going to affect them. 


It also starts with knowing what the problem points are in your community. If you already have a problem with a hospital or a clinic that’s shaky in its funding and people are already worried about it closing, you go back to that problem point and say, “is this gonna make that problem worse or better?”


Local issues give you a chance to really dig deep and be an expert because you are there, day in and day out in your community. You know what's happening, and it's harder to do that sometimes with a national issue.


I think local journalism is the best. It's great training. It's great satisfaction. There's real impact.


How did you keep up with the constantly changing information as the bill went through its many different iterations?


Zauzmer Weil: I was pretty focused on several specific aspects of the bill. It wasn't like I was trying to cover every single policy every single day, but you do have to check. You have to make sure before you hit publish that something hasn't changed. You go back to your sources, you go back to the latest text of the bill, you check in with the experts, and you try your best to be up to date. 


It's also nice to see sometimes our stories can feel outdated, but that might be because our story had an impact.


I did a story that I don't think a lot of people were talking about, about an early version of the way they changed the child tax credit. I wrote a story about that, and later they changed the bill, and that was not the way that it ended up. That's not to say the earlier story was wrong. It may mean that the earlier story had an influence on policymakers who read that and thought, “oh, that's a problem, we can't do it that way,” and they fixed it.


What sources can journalists rely on to gather facts about the bill?


Zauzmer Weil: To start, a great resource is the bill itself. I think a lot of the reporting you read is sort of second or thirdhand, where it's “this person said this” about what the bill does. 


However, there is actual text that you can read, and I found that very helpful, especially as things were changing. As the House version was different from the Senate version, I always found it very helpful to just go to the bill, press control F, search for what you're looking for, and read what it does.


If you're looking for outside resources, there's been a lot of good work on this bill from different academic and nonprofit and advocacy groups. The NYU Tax Law Center has been fabulous. The Yale Budget Lab and a lot of the groups that might advocate for one position or another like the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy or the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. A lot of these groups have done really good, useful analysis.


If you're looking for something really niche and you're not sure who works on it, I usually do a Google Scholar search and just find who's written an article on the subject, and that can lead you to the right expert.


Read on for advice on how journalists can avoid the spread of disinformation.

Overview Understanding the Big Beautiful Bill Part 1 of a webinar series to help journalists enhance their understanding & coverage of the bill major themes Aug. 6 at 1 pm ET With Rachel Snyderman Managing Director of Economic Policy at Bipartisan Policy Center and Michael Thorning Director of Structural Democracy at Bipartisan Policy Center.

Overview: Understanding the “Big Beautiful Bill”


The Institute and the Bipartisan Policy Center are offering a series of virtual briefings to help journalists enhance their understanding and coverage of the bill’s major themes.


Part one of the series will guide journalists through the nuts and bolts of the law and the congressional procedures that were key to its passage, with a particular focus on what is helpful to know for ongoing coverage of the new law and its impacts. Join us on Wednesday, Aug. 6, at 1 p.m. ET.


We’ll dive deeper into the reconciliation process itself, the fiscal impacts the new law is expected to have, and common points of confusion in understanding it all. We’ll look at common mistakes made in talking about the new law that journalists should avoid in their coverage and touch on issues that could surface in Washington again in the near term that could be relevant for future stories.


With rumors already swirling about another reconciliation package in the months ahead, this is your chance to get all of your process questions answered.


Note: This session will be off the record. By registering for it, you’re agreeing to those terms.

Speakers



Additional briefings


CAREER
 

Friday: Lessons from our inaugural Public Health Reporting Fellowship cohort


As the National Press Club Journalism Institute’s inaugural Public Health Reporting Fellowship comes to a close, the five journalists who participated will share details from their ambitious reporting projects, including lessons learned, key findings, and their tips for practicing this type of journalism.


The cohort will have completed investigations into the growing disparities and solutions in disease prevention and health care for immigrant workers, rural populations, and elder communities, among other topics.


Join us at noon ET on Friday, July 25, for a celebration of their hard work; registration is open.

 
 
 
COMMUNITY


Resources

This newsletter is written and edited by the National Press Club Journalism Institute staff: Beth Francesco, Holly Butcher Grant, Elliot C. Williams, Allison Prang, and Mitch Harle. Send us your questions and suggestions for topics to cover.


Get this from a friend? Subscribe, and view the archives.

Facebook  X  Linkedin  Youtube  

DONATE TO THE INSTITUTE


The National Press Club Journalism Institute promotes an engaged global citizenry through an independent and free press, and equips journalists with skills and standards to inform the public in ways that inspire a more representative democracy. As the non-profit affiliate of the National Press Club, the Institute powers journalism in the public interest. The Institute's tax ID number is 52-1750908.