|
Mull: Well, I think that fundamentally the issue is that people didn’t stop buying print magazines, and companies didn’t stop printing print magazines because consumers hated them.
They stopped printing them because the economics of printing physical editions of a magazine became sort of untenable. And I think that what we’re seeing is the realization among publishers of periodicals that they may have moved a little too swiftly to kill off this entire arm of their business. And it turns out that advertisers really like print magazines as well.
So, you might not be able to print a weekly magazine anymore, and some of these companies probably can’t print a monthly magazine anymore, but maybe, like a quarterly magazine. There’s demand for it among readers; there’s demand among advertisers. So, why not give it a try and see if it works?
Scott: You mentioned that advertisers like appearing in magazines. How are these ads different than what they might pay for online?
Mull: I remember when I was a kid reading magazines. There were lots of advertisements, especially in the sort of fashion realm, but also in consumer technology and beauty and lots of different industries that were downright artistic, that people would tear out of magazines and put on their walls.
These were advertisements for products, but people didn’t encounter them as an inconvenience or as something that was trying to get in their way. So that is still the case. In fact, it might be even more so the case. The bad technology in implementing online advertising can make people think worse of your publication, or of your product if you’re the advertiser, and you really don’t get that same capacity for blowback in a print publication because it is just a lot more standardized. It’s a different user experience, and there’s a lot more upsides. Especially for high end brands, and advertisers going that direction.
|