In the May edition of The Pensioner: In the Moment, we looked at the second part of the contribution component of the oversight formula. Over the next few months, we will be exploring the “I” component of the formula: Investments.
In combination with employer contributions and 2011 Tier employee contributions, investment returns fund the System and the promised member benefits. Contributions and investments are highly dependent upon each other. If investment income increases, employer contributions may decrease. Likewise, if investment income decreases, employer contributions may increase.
The MPERS’ Board of Trustees has very broad authority to invest under state statutes. As you might expect, the law requires the Board to fulfill its duty to invest System assets as a prudent person would invest. In other words, the Board makes investments for the purpose of providing benefits to System beneficiaries and expects to pay reasonable expenses of investing, will diversity the assets, and must maintain sufficient liquidity to pay benefits.
The MPERS’ Board is a lay board, which means that the 11 members are not experts in the pension industry, nor are they experts in the investment field. The trustees are required to complete a certain amount of education each year, but as responsible fiduciaries, they must rely on professionals when it comes to making important investment decisions. MPERS has a staff of four investment professionals as well as contracts with independent consultants that help advise the Board regarding investment decisions. This guidance has become increasingly important as the investment portfolio has become more sophisticated and complex. Today, MPERS’ asset allocation and those portfolios of other larger public pension plans are a combination of stocks, bonds, real estate, commodities, and other alternative assets that are rarely utilized by individuals.
In the upcoming editions of The Pensioner: In the Moment, we will be looking at various aspects of the Investment component.