June 30, 2025

Top stories

■ Trump threatens to force journalists to reveal sources who leaked Iran intel report (Rolling Stone) / ‘CBS News foreign correspondent Imtiaz Tyab explained how his team gained access to Iran in the days after U.S. strikes …’ (Status) / CNN, New York Times reject Trump’s demands to retract ‘false’ and ‘unpatriotic’ stories about Iran bombing raids: ‘No apology will be forthcoming’ (Variety) 


■ Trump administration rescinds Voice of America layoffs after errors in notices (New York Times) / Embattled Voice of America employees face termination 'whiplash' (POLITICO) 


■ ‘Trump's team, along with Paramount, tell the court that the two are in advanced negotiations to settle lawsuit in filing.’ (Jessica Toonkel) / ‘President Trump is dropping his lawsuit against pollster J. Ann Selzer. Selzer's attorney tells me there has been no settlement.’ (Tom Dreisbach)



■ California Gov. Gavin Newsom sues Fox News over alleged defamation in story about call with Trump (Associated Press) / Fox News reacts to Newsom's $787M lawsuit over Trump call coverage (Newsweek) 


■ 4th Circuit lifts court access restrictions in high-profile immigration case (Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press) 


■ US Supreme Court to review billion-dollar Cox Communications copyright case (Reuters) / Authors petition publishers to curtail their use of AI (NPR) / BBC rolls out AI summaries and style tool in newsroom test (Forbes) 


■ FCC fines Sinclair $500,000 (TV Tech) 


■ BBC says it ‘should have pulled’ Glastonbury live stream of Bob Vylan anti-IDF chants (The Guardian) / ‘The Glastonbury festival is over, but the fallout is just beginning. Today's UK papers are full of headlines blasting the BBC for live-streaming Bob Vylan's set.’ (Brian Stelter) 


■ The San Francisco Standard acquires Charter, welcomes Kevin Delaney as editor-in-chief (The Standard) / ‘Behind the deal is Michael Moritz, the SF billionaire who placed early bets on Google and PayPal and is now investing in news.’ (Ben Mullin)


■ Iowa newspaper company agrees to $9.5 million payout, faces three new class-action claims (Iowa Capital Dispatch)


■ Substack is having a moment — again. But time is running out (WIRED)


■ Fox Television Stations elevates leadership across multiple local markets (TV News Check) / Wisconsin Watch hires Dunlap to cover jobs (Talking Biz News) / Bloomberg's Lee joins Weekend Americas team as editor (Talking Biz News) 


■ The hurricane forecast cone is changing, and journalists are part of the overhaul (Poynter) 


■ The Concorde-and-caviar era of Condé Nast, when magazines ruled the earth (New York Times)

CRAFT

‘Stand by your reporting’: Two D.C. journalists on covering Trump 2.0 


Five months into the second Trump administration, journalists responsible for covering the White House are navigating a more difficult environment, from changes to the press pool rules to verbal attacks and the threat of lawsuits related to coverage.  


One newsroom that continues to draw attention from administration officials is NOTUS, a D.C. publication from the nonprofit, nonpartisan Allbritton Journalism Institute. 


They first went viral last month when Trump told NOTUS reporter Reese Gorman to “get a real job” after asking a question about the “big, beautiful bill.” The following week — after breaking the news that Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s “Make America Healthy Again” report cited studies that didn’t exist — White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt denied their reporting by saying the errors were only formatting. (Read the Institute’s interview with the reporters who broke the MAHA story.)    


And this month, Leavitt lashed out again at White House correspondent and reporter Jasmine Wright for asking a question about the military parade. 


Beyond these viral moments, NOTUS has been delivering coverage on Washington through their relaunched daily newsletter. To learn more about their strategy for covering Trump 2.0, the Institute reached out to Wright and veteran reporter Evan McMorris-Santoro.


What are the major differences you are seeing in terms of covering the White House during Trump 2.0? What advice do you have for other journalists this time around?

McMorris-Santoro: The first Trump administration was really about that famous Salena Zito quote about taking the president seriously, but not literally. It was hard to know what was real on any given day and what was just an admittedly enthralling but mostly silly drama. 


This term is about taking Trump seriously and literally. Campaign promises even some of his supporters doubted would ever happen are in the process of happening. This term is a lot more about understanding the MAGA movement’s intentions and paying close attention to how that’s being implemented throughout policy and politics. 

At NOTUS, we are publishing a ton of deep policy stories and close looks at the way the other branches of government are reacting to those changes. Our newsletter tries to make it easy to eat all those vegetables every day. 


My advice for other journalists: Consume, consume, consume. I spend a lot of time reading trade association newsletters and Reddit threads for government employees and issue experts to get the view of what some of these policy changes mean in their worlds. I also follow a lot of podcasts and Substacks to get immersed in the political theory behind the actions the administration is taking. 


This is a White House of action, and it’s important to stay focused on what is actually happening and also why it is.


There have been significant changes to the press pool and briefing room this term. Can you describe how you’re navigating the new rules and culture?

Wright: I think the rules have changed but the culture is pretty much the same. Most people who show up in the briefing room every day are hardworking journalists who want to get to the truth.


For NOTUS, having access to the new media seat and being in the new rotation is a plus because we’re not part of the pool rotation, though we’re cognizant of the perils that come with officials being able to pick and choose who covers them. 


This means we take the questions we pose very seriously — because the goal is always to shed light on what the administration is doing and thinking.

So we don’t seek to grandstand but we don’t shy away from asking tough questions either.


What advice do you have for journalists interacting with combative government officials?


Wright: Be firm in your questions and stand by your reporting. It’s never stupid. If you have the information to back it up and have done your homework to know the issue inside and out, no one can take that away from you. 


It’s also important to keep an open mind — you may have one piece of the story but you may not have it all. 


And lastly, try to have some grace! Don’t accept disrespect and speak your mind if you feel it, but the officials who you talk to on a daily basis typically have someone to answer to, too. So sometimes, their response isn’t even about you.


President Trump has signed 165 executive orders since taking office five months ago. How do you decide what to focus on each day? What are your go-to resources for staying up to date on the latest issues?


McMorris-Santoro: One of the greatest things about NOTUS is we have this staff of fellows who are bringing new energy and approaches to journalism. I asked them for help on this. 


Emily Kennard mentioned DCInbox.com, a project that collects and collates all the public statements congressional offices send out, “to keep up with what lawmakers are talking about, not just on X,” she explains. Nuha Dolby loves Data Is Plural, which collects published datasets around the internet. John T. Seward regularly checks OAF Nation on IG, which collects investigative reporting on global conflict. (This is war fighter-focused news, and he warns: “There's a lot of dark humor memes” that might offend civilians.)


My take is that not enough people are talking about Major Garrett’s show on CBS News 24/7, the free streaming network. This is a deeply wonky, plugged in, and intelligent show that is always informative and entertaining. It’s a real politics news show in a world where that term has come to mean “well-paid pundits yelling at each other.”


Wright: The easiest way to answer this question is: It depends! Sometimes we are following the news cycle because it’s important and necessary to keep our readers informed. 


Unlike other outlets, we aren’t beholden to the news cycle. We have the bandwidth to march to our own beat and report out our stories in a deeper way. As a result, people come to us not only when they want to know more about an issue that’s dominating the headlines — and why they should care — but also when they want to know something new that no one else has.

CAREER
 

Leadership Tip: 3 ways to handle and diffuse conflict


“Tension and disagreement are inevitable in the workplace. But there’s a difference between healthy and unhealthy conflict. …


1. Say it’s OK. Normalize disagreement. Tell your team it’s expected and essential for collaboration. Set clear norms: focus on ideas, not people, and respect different perspectives. When conflict arises, remind them it’s a sign of engagement, not dysfunction. …


2. Depersonalize. Separate people from problems. Ask team members to argue against their own perspective to consider alternate ways of thinking. This exercise builds empathy, fosters open-mindedness, and reduces defensiveness during debates.


3. Stay calm. Your reaction sets the tone. When conflict arises, model curiosity. A steady presence makes it safe for others to speak up. If tensions rise, gently steer the conversation back to shared goals.”


-- HBR editors, excerpt from “Our favorite management tips on dealing with conflict” (Harvard Business Review)

 
 
 
COMMUNITY

Resources

This newsletter is written and edited by the National Press Club Journalism Institute staff: Beth Francesco, Holly Butcher Grant, Elliot C. Williams, Allison Prang, and Mitch Harle. Send us your questions and suggestions for topics to cover.


Get this from a friend? Subscribe, and view the archives.

Facebook  X  Linkedin  Youtube  

DONATE TO THE INSTITUTE


The National Press Club Journalism Institute promotes an engaged global citizenry through an independent and free press, and equips journalists with skills and standards to inform the public in ways that inspire a more representative democracy. As the non-profit affiliate of the National Press Club, the Institute powers journalism in the public interest. The Institute's tax ID number is 52-1750908.