19 To heal is to liberate totally. We once said there is no order of difficulty in miracles because they are
all maximal expressions of love. This has no range at all. The non-maximal only
appears to have a range. This is because it
seems to be meaningful to measure it
from the maximum and identify its position by
how much it is
not there. Actually, this does not mean anything. It is like negative numbers in that the concept can be used theoretically, but it has no application practically. It is true that if you put three apples on the table and then take them away, the three apples are not there. But it is
not true that the table is now
minus three apples. If there is
nothing on the table, it does not matter what
was there in terms of amount. The "nothing" is neither greater nor less because of what is absent.
20 That is why "all" and "nothing" are dichotomous,
without a range. This is perfectly clear in considering psychological tests of maximal performance. You cannot interpret the results
at all unless you assume either
maximal motivation or
no motivation at all. Only in these two conditions can you validly compare responses, and you
must assume the former, because if the latter were true, the subject would not do
anything. Given
variable motivation, he will do something, but
you cannot understand
what it is.
21 The results of such tests are evaluated relatively
assuming maximal motivation, but this is because we are dealing with
abilities, where degree of development is meaningful. This does
not mean that what the ability is used
for is necessarily either limited
or divided. Yet one thing is certain—abilities are
potentials for learning, and you will apply them to what you
want to learn. Learning is
effort, and effort means
will. We have used the term "abilities" in the plural because abilities began with the ego, which perceived them as
potentials for excelling. This is how the ego
still perceives them and uses them.
22 The ego does not
want to teach everyone all it has learned because that would
defeat its purpose. Therefore, it does not
really learn at all. The Holy Spirit teaches you to use what the ego has made to teach the
opposite of what the ego has learned. The
kind of learning is as irrelevant as is the particular ability which was applied
to the learning. You could not have a better example of the Holy Spirit's unified purpose than this course. The Holy Spirit has taken very diversified areas of
your learning and has applied them to a
unified curriculum. The fact that this was
not the ego's reason for learning is totally irrelevant.
23
You made the effort to learn, and the Holy Spirit has a unified goal for
all effort. He
adapts the ego's potentials for excelling to potentials for
equalizing. This makes them
useless for the ego's purpose but
very useful for His. If different abilities are applied long enough to one goal, the abilities
themselves become unified. This is because they are channelized in one direction or in one
way. Ultimately, then, they all contribute to
one result, and by so doing, their similarity rather than their differences is emphasized. You can
excel in many
different ways, but you can
equalize in
one way only. Equality is
not a variable state, by definition.
24 That is why you will be able to perform
all aspects of your work with ease when you have learned
this course. To the ego there appears to be no connection, because the
ego is discontinuous. Yet the Holy Spirit teaches
one lesson and applies it to
all individuals in
all situations. Being conflict-free, He maximizes
all efforts and
all results. By teaching the power of the Kingdom of God Himself, He teaches you that
all power is yours. Its application does not matter. It is
always maximal. Your vigilance does not
establish it as yours, but it
does enable you to use it
always and in
all ways.
25 When I said, "I am with you always," I meant it literally. I am not absent to
anyone in
any situation.
Because I am always with you,
you are the way and the truth and the light. You did not make this power, any more than I did. It was created to
be shared and therefore cannot be meaningfully perceived as belonging to anyone
at the expense of another. Such a perception makes it meaningless by eliminating or overlooking its
real and
only meaning.