|
Carrageenan is NOT a Preservative
Costco faces a class action lawsuit over the use of carrageenan in its renowned rotisserie chicken. The suit alleges that the "No Preservative" claim on the front of the package label is false and misleading because the chicken contains carrageenan, which 'is a preservative'.
During legal proceedings, Costco has removed "No Preservative" from the front of package label. It did not, however, discontinue the use of carrageenan.
A federal court hearing was scheduled on Sept. 18, 2026, at 10 am in San Diego.
IMR (Dennis) appeared at the scheduled time, only to find that the hearing was postponed to Dec 18, 2026 at 10 am. Unfortunately, Dennis will be on a flight back from Europe at that time. Nesha will attend if the hearing is not continued again.
For our San Diego-based Hydrocolleagues who may wish to attend, the hearing will be in courtroom 4A under Judge Anthony Battaglia, Federal Courthouse, 221 W. Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101
The online docket information is HERE
We suggest you check before going to the courthouse. The case may be settled out of court and before the next scheduled date.
In IMR's commercial and technical experience, carrageenan is not, and has never been, used to prevent spoilage, which is the function of a preservative. Carrageenan has been used in birth control formulations which, for some of our Francophone hydrocolleagues, would qualify it as a preservative, but that is a linguistic idiosyncrasy. Why this case was not summarily thrown out for lack of legal standing escapes us. IMR is not a legal firm, nor do we give legal advice; however, we reserve the right to our opinions. Carrageenan is not a food preservative, plain and simple.
IMR will continue to work on correcting hydrocolloid misconceptions wherever possible and defending their proper use according to established regulations.
As always we welcome the thoughts and feedback from our Hydrocolleagues..
|