Does Cultivar Resistance to Dollar Spot Impact Fungicide Inputs?
Most older golf course turfs can sustain dollar spot damage throughout much of the growing season because the grasses are not very resistant to the disease and weather conditions are frequently conducive for dollar spot activity. As a result, a calendar-based fungicide program is typically the most effective approach to managing the disease.
Another method to schedule fungicide treatments is threshold-based. That is, if you see dollar spot, then you spray. “This curative approach is risky, especially on highly susceptible grasses,” says Hempfling. “You don’t see it one day and the next day it is everywhere!” Although it has potential for reducing fungicide inputs, curative applications also pose the biggest risk for unacceptable disease outbreaks.
One would assume that you could use less fungicides to control dollar spot disease on the more resistant cultivars, but there was little data to prove this hypothesis.
“Low hanging fruit of my research was to scientifically quantify how much you can reduce fungicide inputs when using a highly resistant cultivar,” said Hempfling. As expected, a cultivar that is resistant to dollar spot required less fungicides - an average of 61% less in 2015 and 2017 when disease pressure was high. “That is a big number, especially when you translate that to fairways, which are the largest treated area on golf courses.”
This research provides initial data on the impact of cultivar selection on fungicide inputs, and the Rutgers team is currently evaluating other bentgrass cultivars to generate additional data. The goal is to provide superintendents with a thorough cost analysis to use when considering re-grassing fairways with dollar spot resistant cultivars.
Thanks to student scholarships from the NJTA and financial backing from many other turfgrass organizations, Rutgers continues to provide science-based solutions to management challenges in the industry.