|
Next Tuesday, August 11, the City Council will discuss the proposed budgets for the Long Beach Police Department and Long Beach Fire Department. Given the significant budget deficit facing the City this year, we knew emergency services would be affected. However, I believe we need to limit the effect these reductions will have on the emergency response services residents rely on.
Starting with our Police Department, I am encouraged that the proposed budget includes $7 million in Measure A funding for Police Academy Class 101, which allows for about 70 new recruits.
The budget also makes the High Crime Focus Team structural by reallocating 12 existing officers from other assignments, including eight bike patrol positions. This High Crime Focus Team plays an important role in addressing violent crime, including issues we have seen on 2nd Street.
At the same time, the City proposed eliminating more than 50 sworn positions, while the Mayor has recommended restoring four patrol officers and two Quality of Life officers. The reductions include 13 vacant patrol positions, 18 vacant investigative positions, six vacant Motors positions, five Quality of Life positions, and several other specialized assignments.
Emergency response times are my primary concern. The patrol positions proposed for elimination are currently vacant, but the funding for those positions is used to pay for overtime so enough officers are available to respond to 911 calls, particularly when officers are out on leave or assigned elsewhere. Eliminating these positions, along with reducing overtime capacity, would mean fewer officers available to answer 911 calls or respond to emergencies.
The City’s average Priority 1 response time, which reflects responses to life-threatening emergencies, has increased from 4.4 minutes in fiscal year 2020 to approximately 5.6 minutes today. For Priority 2 and 3 calls, between July 2021 and July 2024, response times rose from about 31 to 51 minutes and from 43 to 64 minutes, respectively. While LBPD projects that Priority 1 response times will remain at 5.6 minutes, Priority 2 and 3 response times are expected to continue increasing.
I have requested more analysis of how the proposed reductions could affect patrol capacity and Priority 1, 2, and 3 response times. I hope to receive that information before Tuesday’s discussion.
The budget also proposes shifting one Police Sergeant and four Police Officers to Tidelands patrol assignments funded through the restricted Tidelands Fund. I support increasing patrol capacity in the Tidelands area, and we should have a clear process to document that these positions remain focused on Tidelands-related work so restricted funds are not used to subsidize general municipal services.
For the Fire Department, my biggest concern is the proposed elimination of Engine 14, while Fire Station 14 near Colorado Lagoon would remain open. Under the proposal, the station would continue to house its Basic Life Support ambulance, and a paramedic rescue unit would be moved from Station 4 in Belmont Heights to Station 14. However, it would no longer be staffed with a fire engine, and Engine 14’s fire suppression duties would be handled by neighboring engines. This change would save about $3.8 million from the General Fund.
I understand the Fire Department’s analysis shows that eliminating Engine 14 would have the lowest service impact compared with other engine reductions, but I disagree with reducing emergency response capacity in southeast Long Beach while demand in the area is growing. Approximately 1,200 housing units are in development near 2nd and PCH, bringing thousands of additional residents to southeast Long Beach. AES is also expanding its battery storage facility on Studebaker Road next to its natural gas power plant. These are exactly the kinds of factors I believe we need to consider before reducing fire suppression and emergency response capacity in the city. When residents call 911, they expect the City to be able to respond quickly. Protecting that capacity needs to remain a priority as we work through this difficult budget.
I encourage residents to participate in the City Council meeting on Tuesday, August 11, and share their views on the proposed public safety and emergency response reductions. Residents may now provide public comment virtually or by phone, making it easier to participate without attending City Hall in person.
|