There have been many attempts to understand the invasion of Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin wants power, money, prestige, destruction of alleged “Nazis” in Ukraine, the ultimate war against the West, and even progressive philanthropist George Soros.
Putin claimed the West was echoing the Nazis’ antisemitic pogroms in trying to “cancel” Russia by banning Russian music, culture, and literature. “There is only one goal,” Putin said. “The destruction of Russia.”[1] This, he said, must be defeated. There is also a Western claim that Putin distrusts democracy and Ukraine, as a democratic state, is in defiance of the older and venerable form of the authoritarian state. He also claims that Ukraine is taking on Western values, such as gay marriage and validation of homosexuality, an idea considered abhorrent to Russians, especially the Orthodox.
This could be part of Samuel Huntington’s “clash of civilizations” theory that claims the major world civilizations are not going to be reconciled but will continually clash in the future. He lists the Orthodox civilization as one of the major players, along with the West, Latin America, Muslim, Eastern, and sub-Saharan. Simple love and rationality will not solve these problems.
Putin is very pro-Russian Orthodox. He not only attends church, but also goes to Mount Athos once a year for retreats and immerses himself in the January frozen waters of Russia at Epiphany. As the former Archbishop of Canterbury writes:
lllllllPutin’s close ally and supporter, Patriarch Kirill of Moscow, made it clear in
lllllllan extraordinary sermon delivered on 6 March, the day before Orthodox Lent
lllllllbegan, that he regarded the Russian campaign as a war to defend Orthodox
lllllllcivilization against Western corruption. … It may help to consider how
lllllllUkraine seems to some Russians like a dangerous hybrid of cultures: a place
lllllllthat looks Orthodox, with a history that’s key to Russia’s own Christian
lllllllidentity, but in fact is a Trojan horse for the godless indifference of the
lllllllWest.”[2]
There is, of course, always the question of sincerity – for Putin and for all. But we need a wide vision of what is going on, and not just limit ourselves to the usual answers of power or prestige. We should take others at their word and not think we know them better than they do. Putin described the bloody assault as salvation for Ukraine and spoke of a religious duty “to relieve these people of suffering.”
Astonishingly, he quoted the Bible to justify his blitzkrieg: “I recall the words from the Holy Scripture: Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. … In his own mind, his mission is transcendent. … In Putin’s view, the “Euro-Atlantic countries” have lost their spiritual anchor, according to biographer Myers. “They are denying moral principles and all traditional identities: national, cultural, religious, and even sexual” and are on “a direct path to degradation and primitivism,” Putin said in a 2013 speech quoted by Myers.”[3]
In spite of this, few call it a religious war, or “holy war,” which when pursued often brings out the worst in us. But religion, history, and culture have always been inextricably mixed, and we need to get a handle on all of these to understand the war. We need integration of subjects to grasp this. There is never just one factor in big-time matters. Thomas Meaney, who teaches at Humboldt University in Berlin and writes in the New York Times, stresses the idea of a civilizational war:
lllllllAs former Warsaw Pact countries welcomed NATO expansion, (Putin) shifted
lllllllto a more civilizational understanding of Russia’s place in the world, one
lllllllbased on ‘Eastern’ values: the Orthodox Church, patriarchal chauvinism,
lllllllanti-homosexuality edicts, as well as a notion of a greater ethnic Russian
lllllllidentity whose ancient wellspring is inconveniently Kyiv, Ukraine. Protesters
lllllllsuch as Pussy Riot and others who struck directly at this neocivilizational
lllllllimage came in for swift retribution.[4]
And again, on the same day in the New York Times, Stephen Erlanger writes:
lllllllThe idea of Russia as a separate civilization from the West with which it
lllllllcompetes goes back centuries, to the roots of Orthodox Christianity and the
lllllllnotion of Moscow as a ‘third Rome,’ following Rome itself and
lllllllConstantinople. … There is prepared soil for such ideas in Russia, which has
lllllllbeen torn for centuries between ‘Westernizers’ and those who see the West as
llllllla cancer – alien, decadent, insidious, and threatening.”[5]
Jane Burbank writes:
lllllllAleksandr Dugin [1997] highlighted the long-term connection between
lllllllEastern Orthodoxy and Russian empire. Orthodoxy’s combat against Western
lllllllChristianity and Western decadence could be harnessed to the geopolitical
lllllllwar to come. Eurasian geopolitics, Russian Orthodoxy and traditional values
lllllll— these goals shaped Russia’s self-image under Mr. Putin’s leadership. The
lllllllthemes of imperial glory and Western victimization were propagated across
lllllllthe country. … This brew of attitudes – complaints about Western aggression,
lllllllexaltation of traditional values over the decadence of individual rights,
lllllllassertions of Russia’s duty to unite Eurasia and subordinate Ukraine –
llllllldeveloped in the cauldron of post-imperial resentment. Now they infuse Mr.
lllllllPutin’s worldview and inspire his brutal war. The goal, plainly, is empire. And
lllllllthe line will not be drawn at Ukraine.[6]
But to be practical, what do we do with Ukraine now that Russia has invaded? Vladimir Putin wants to return to the old Russian Empire based on its religion and ethnicity. The Russian Orthodox Church has by and large approved the invasion. Putin considers Ukraine part of the Russian ethnic civilization. Fiona Hill:
lllllllI have a picture that I was given, of me and a whole bunch of us sitting at that
lllllllbig white table with Putin. So Putin has four statues in that room. One is
lllllllCatherine the Great. And when he talks of Crimea, he looks at her, because he
llllllldid this with me and Bolton and Huntsman and others. And we thought,
lllllllreally? Because it’s, you know, Catherine the Great who basically annexed
lllllllCrimea. The other is Peter the Great, the first person who really created the
lllllllRussian Empire in the Battle of Poltava in Ukraine. Catherine the Great is
lllllllalso the creation of New Russia. And then the other two are Nicholas the I,
lllllllwho fought the debacle of the Crimean War, but was the hard czar who
lllllllbasically made the world safe for autocracy during all the uprisings of 1848.
There are other issues such as the history of NATO pushing against Russia, and possible nuclear war in the future. One treads carefully trying to impose democracy, or even order or fairness. We cannot go nuclear over Eastern Europe.
Wars are fought for many reasons and culture and religion with ethnicity are some of the most important. It is happening elsewhere now. Erlanger again:
lllllllChina, the other great autocracy in the Biden formulation, is built on similar
lllllllideas of ethnic nationalism – that all Chinese are part of the same nation,
lllllllthat minorities like the Uyghurs are inferior or dangerous, and that Taiwan’s
lllllllseparation is illusory, a crime of history that must be repaired. Even India, a
lllllllgreat democracy, has been pushed into ethnic nationalism by Prime Minister
lllllllNarendra Modi, with his Hindu ascendancy. In Turkey, President Recep
lllllllTayyip Erdogan has recreated historical tales of the Ottoman Empire while
lllllllacting in solidarity with Turkic-speaking peoples in Azerbaijan, Nagorno
lllllllKarabakh and in Central Asia.[7]
lllllllBut the Orthodox churches are deeply divided on Ukraine and Russia’s role
lllllllin the world. What Putin sees as a political restoration; the head of the
lllllllRussian Orthodox Metropolitan Kirill sees as a crusade. But the patriarch
lllllllhas sparked a backlash at home as well as among churches abroad linked to
lllllllthe Moscow Patriarchate. In Russia, nearly 300 Orthodox members of a
lllllllgroup called Russian Priests for Peace signed a letter condemning the
lllllll‘murderous orders’ carried out in Ukraine. … Of 260 million Orthodox
lllllllChristians in the world, about 100 million are in Russia itself and some of
lllllllthose abroad are in unity with Moscow. But the war has strained those
lllllllrelations. Kirill, who claims Ukraine as an indivisible part of his spiritual
llllllljurisdiction, had already severed ties with Bartholomew, the Istanbul-based
lllllllEcumenical Patriarch, who acts as a first among equals in the Orthodox world
llllllland backs the autonomy of Ukraine's Orthodox Church.