SHARE:  

We are excited to announce the Second Edition of "Representing People with Mental Disabilities: A Practical Guide for Criminal Defense Lawyers" was released on August 20, 2024.


A copy is available to be purchased below!

Purchase Your Copy

We are excited to announce that the second edition of Elizabeth’s groundbreaking book, Representing People with Mental Disabilities: A Practical Guide for Criminal Defense Lawyers has been released. This edition includes several new chapters including Substance Use Disorders and Post-conviction remedies, in addition to updates to chapters on Competency, Sanity, False Confessions, and Neuro-imaging. See the introduction below for even more details.

Introduction:


How the world has changed during the six years between the publication of the first edition of this book in 2018 and the second in 2024. The pandemic touched virtually every life and institution across the planet. And because of the pandemic, the awareness of mental health issues has heightened due to the impact of the lockdown during that time and the trauma many are still dealing with because of social isolation and the reordering of the world as we knew it.


To the degree that the criminal legal system reflects society at large, it too has become more aware of mental health issues. Indeed, even before the pandemic, a disproportionately high number of people in jails and prisons had mental health issues. But now, there is a growing awareness, a thirst for more information, and a quest for solutions. Thus, this is a perfect time for a second edition of Representing People with Mental Disabilities: A Practical Guide for Criminal Defense Lawyers.


This second edition is significantly different than the first. Several chapters are new: “Testing,” “Substance Use Disorder,” and “Post-Conviction Remedies.” Some chapters have changed or expanded in scope; Chapter 10 about false confessions includes a more thorough discussion of Miranda, and Chapter 13 about mental health courts is now titled “Mental Health Courts and Other Diversion Options.” The chapter on juveniles has been renamed “Youthful Offenders.” Other chapters have been updated by their authors from the first edition.


The format remains the same. I have written a short introduction to each chapter. The content is still meant to be practical and readable. Chapters can be read in one sitting. All authors, notwithstanding their

scholarly and professional qualifications, were asked to keep endnotes to a minimum. If readers want to learn more about a topic, they are encouraged to consult the Suggested Works section at the back of the book, which is arranged by chapter.


The content in one chapter may necessarily overlap with that in another. On the one hand, it is sufficient to read one chapter. On the other hand, for a broader understanding of a topic, a reader may want to explore a related chapter. For example, you may want to know the difference between competency and sanity (otherwise known as criminal responsibility). Thus, you should read Chapter 1, “Competency to Stand Trial” by Dr. Eric Y. Drogin and Chapter 2, “Criminal Responsibility” by Professor Lucy Guarnera and Professor Richard Bonnie. But curiosity takes you to Chapter 6 on malingering by Richard Rogers, Kamar Tazi, and Dr. Drogin. Similarly, you read Chapter 14 on veteran’s courts by Professor Julie Marie Baldwin, which may lead you to Chapter 13 on mental health courts and other diversion options by defenders Katherine Bujak and Jeffery Berman. That discussion may motivate you to read Chapter 19 on ethical issues by federal public defender Peggy Cross-Goldberg.


As with the first edition, I am deliberate about my word choice. “Mental disabilities” is my global term for mental illness (issues like bipolar disorder and schizophrenia), intellectual/developmental disabilities (like

autism spectrum disorder and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder), and neurological conditions like dementia. That being said, many people have co-occurring disorders or dual diagnoses. Moreover, it is important to

understand what something is and is not; for example, some people on the autism spectrum do not have an intellectual disability but they may have a co-occurring disorder. In the meantime, autism is a developmental disability. All of this is important in terms of understanding a client’s complexity, knowing what expert or experts to seek, and knowing how to most effectively advocate for your client.


I have many colleagues to thank for their contributions to this book. First and foremost, I would like to thank the authors of each chapter. I respect the time, knowledge, and creativity they channeled into their

chapters. I would also like to thank the ABA for again supporting one of my writing adventures. In particular, I thank Bryan Kay, who was a staunch advocate for this volume, as well as Lorraine Murray. Also, I appreciate the leadership of the Criminal Justice Section, namely Chairs Justin Bingham and Tina Luongo, who understood the need for a second edition.


Special recognition goes to those who peer-reviewed chapters, including Justin Murphy, Esq., Dr. Kenneth P. Rosenberg, Dr Charles Samenow, Dr. Michael Santa Maria, and Lizett M. Schreiber.

Finally, I thank the members of my team who help me in my law practice: Christine Andraus, Amber Fayerberg, Hannah Friedman, Kathryn Koontz, Julia Milan, and Starr Oldorff. In particular, I thank Lisa Johnson, who kept track of the thousands of moving parts that comprise this volume and always did so with grace and good humor.


I have devoted my practice and my life to representing people with mental disabilities. I am appalled by the fact that we criminalize people for manifesting the symptoms of their disabilities. In addition to advocating for my clients in my practice, I do a good deal of writing and speaking in order to educate criminal defense lawyers, judges, and anyone who will listen about the intersection of mental disabilities and the criminal legal system. But all the education in the world will not meaningfully help people with mental disabilities unless and until we first have a robust system of resources in the community to prevent criminal conduct from ever occurring; second, we return to rehabilitation and treatment as goals of our criminal legal system such that they are not eclipsed by punishment, incapacitation, and retribution; and finally, we modify our laws at the state and federal levels in order to give prosecutors and judges the discretion they need in order to wisely and humanely resolve these cases.



Elizabeth Kelley

Editor

Please join us for our online book launch on October 10, 2024!

Mental Disability and the Criminal Justice System
A podcast which provides information - and hope - to people with mental disabilities ensnared in the criminal justice system, as well as to their families and attorneys.
Listen Here
In The News

Disbarred lawyer Tom Girardi has smaller hippocampus than 98% of population, neurologist testifies


Updated: A neurology professor testified last week that disbarred lawyer Tom Girardi has such a small brain hippocampus that 98% of people likely have a larger one.


Helena Chang Chui, the chair of the neurology department at the University of Southern California’s Keck School of Medicine, testified Thursday in Girardi’s embezzlement trial in Los Angeles, Law360 reports.


A 2021 MRI showed the atrophy of Girardi’s hippocampus, which is responsible for recording new memories.


“I cannot remember seeing anyone in my practice with a hippocampus this small having a normal memory,” Chui said.

Editorial: A shiny new jail in L.A. is a bad idea, no matter what it’s called


There is no disagreement over the proper fate of Men’s Central Jail in downtown Los Angeles.


The decrepit facility must be torn down with all deliberate speed — just as soon as county leaders make alternative arrangements for the thousands of people housed there at any given time.



And there’s the rub. What do we do with everybody, especially the enormous percentage of people who landed in jail in part because of psychiatric or drug problems?


For years, the Board of Supervisors clung to the most rote and self-destructive answer: Build another jail, with a new name to imply a new mindset. It was going to be called the Consolidated Correctional Treatment Facility, then the Mental Health Treatment Center. The name being bandied about now is the Care First Treatment Campus. 

Federal court oversight of Oregon State Hospital enters new phase


U.S. District Judge Adrienne Nelson is pressing all sides involved in decades-old civil rights litigation to pursue creative solutions, and several lawyers in the case call for further action by the state to beef up services for people experiencing mental illness.


Oregon’s lack of behavioral health treatment beds continues to provide new and expanding employment for lawyers, as long-running litigation around the Oregon State Hospital increasingly has put a federal court in charge of managing its day-to-day operations.


Based on a lawsuit filed 22 years ago, the recently revived court standoff around the facility keeps giving birth to new litigation offspring in state and federal court.

Read More
Read more
Read more

This Company Promised to Improve Health Care in Jails. Dozens of Its Patients Have Died.


NORMAN, Oklahoma — Two days after Thanksgiving in 2022, Shannon Hanchett walked into an AT&T store for a new phone, and ended up in handcuffs.


Hanchett ran the Cookie Cottage, a popular bakery in this college town, where she made treats named for places across the state, from Stilwell Strawberry to Lawton Lemon. But lately, her mental health seemed to be fraying. She was falling behind on orders. Her marriage was crumbling. And the 38-year-old mother of two had picked fights with family and friends.


This article was published in partnership with The Frontier.

It all detonated that day in the AT&T store.

Understanding the Fight to Protect People With Intellectual Disability From Execution


The Arc of the United States, along with our partners, recently filed an amicus brief in a critical case before the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Ex Parte Blaine Milam. This case highlights an ongoing issue in our criminal justice system: the unconstitutional execution of people with intellectual disability (ID).


Here’s what you need to know about this important fight for justice.


The Background

In 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. Virginia that executing people with ID violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

Reentry Considerations for Inmates With Mental Illness


Supporting patients’ continuity of treatment in the community after release from custody is an essential component of health care in jails and prisons. With the high rates of mental illness and substance use disorders in the incarcerated population, individuals often have extensive mental health needs on release.


Services geared toward improving treatment engagement in the community, typically referred to as reentry services, include linking patients to outpatient treatment providers in their communities, prescribing psychotropic medication, facilitating access to community-based treatment programs or supportive housing, and coordinating insurance coverage.

Read More
Read More
Read More
Books
Purchase Your Copy
Purchase Your Copy
Purchase Your Copy
Linkedin  Instagram  Twitter  
Visit our website

(509) 991-7058

www.elizabethkelleylaw.com

zealousadvocacy@aol.com